Impacto de la inteligencia artificial en la esfera legal

  • Vasiliev Anton Altai State University, Russian Federation
  • Pechatnova Yylia Altai State University, Russian Federation
Palabras clave: derecho digital, regulación legal, inteligencia artificial, ciberespacio, robots, criptomoneda.

Resumen

La investigación está dedicada al análisis de las oportunidades y perspectivas para la implementación de la inteligencia artificial en el sistema legal. El objetivo del estudio es analizar las ventajas y desventajas, oportunidades y límites de la introducción de las tecnologías digitales en el entorno legal. El estudio analizó los puntos de vista sobre el tema de la investigación entre los científicos nacionales y extranjeros, evaluó la influencia de la inteligencia artificial en la esfera legal. También estudiamos las oportunidades de regulación relacionadas con las tecnologías digitales en la legislación rusa actual, las ventajas y desventajas de las nuevas categorías en el Código Civil de la Federación Rusa. Presentamos ejemplos del impacto negativo del vacío legal en la práctica de aplicación de la ley y sugerimos las formas de su superación. También se estudiaron las tendencias actuales en la incorporación de tecnologías digitales en la esfera legal de la Federación de Rusia y otros países.

Descargas

La descarga de datos todavía no está disponible.

Citas

Alben, A. (2019). Privacy, Freedom, and Technology—or “How Did We Get into This Mess?”. Seattle University Law Review, 3, 1043 – 1055.

Avakian, S., Peikin, S., & McDonald, J. (2018). U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, Joint Statement by SEC and CFTC Enforcement Directors Regarding Virtual Currency Enforcement Actions. Available from: https://www.sec.gov/news/public-statement/joint-statement-sec-and-cftc-enforcementdirectors?lipi=urn%3Ali%3Apage%3Ad_flagship3_feed%3BpNba0W7eTJGeW%2FSWptamAQ%3D%3D.

Bodó, B., Gervais, D., Quintais, J.P. (2018). Blockchain and smartcontracts: the missing link in copyright licensing? International Journal of Law and Information Technology, 26(4), 311–336, https://doi.org/10.1093/ijlit/eay014

Decision No. 2-160/2017 2-160/2017 ~ M-129/2017 M-129/2017 from April 26, 2017 in case No.2-160/2017. Available from: http://sudact.ru/regular/doc/qlE6zawJCy6l/

Google complained about a ban on robots reading letters. Available from: http://sutyajnik.ru/news/2016/05/2649.html

Joshua A.T. (2019). The Human Element: The Under-Thorized and Underutilized Component Vital to Fostering Blockchain Development, Faculty Scholarship. Available from: htts://scholarlycommons.law.wlu.edu/wlufac/537

Markovic, M. (2019). Rise of the Robot Lawyers? Ariz. L. Rev., 61, 325. Available from: htts://scholarship.law.tamu.edu/facscholar/1320

Mik, E. (2007). Contract Formation in Open Electronic Networks, Singapore Management University. Available from: htts://works.bepress.com/elizamik/2/

Nicholson Price, W.II. (2017). Artificial Intelligence in Health Care: Applications and Legal Implications. The SciTech Lawyer, 14(1), (2017).

Regulating Emerging Robotic Technologies in Europe: Robotics facing Law and Ethics. (2018). Available from: http://www.robolaw.eu/

Research Center for Robotics and Artificial Intelligence Regulation Issues. (2018). Available from: http://robopravo.ru/

Robot mediator settles first ever court case. (2019). Available from: https://www.legalfutures.co.uk/latest-news/robot-mediator-settles-first-ever-court-case

Robots in the law. Should artificial intelligence be responsible for its own transgressions. (2018). National Research University Higher School of Economics Institute for Statistical Studies and Economics of Knowledge. Available from: https://issek.hse.ru/news/227178200.html

RTM technologies. (2018). Available from: http://www.rtm.group/

Schuster, W.M. (2018). Artificial Intelligence and Patent Ownership. 75 Wash. & Lee L. Rev. 1945. Available from: htts://scholarlycommons.law.wlu.edu/wlulr/vol75/iss4/5

Steven P.T. (2019). Requiem for Cyberspace: The Effect of the European

General Privacy Regulation on the Global Internet. Seattle University Law Review, 4, 1163-1173.

Stewart, L. (2019). Big Data Discrimination: Maintaining Protection of Individual Privacy Without Disincentivizing Businesses’ Use of Biometric Data to Enhance Security, 60 B.C.L. Rev. 347. Available from: htts://lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu/bclr/vol60/iss1/8

The legal personality of artificial intelligence in the field of law. (2018). Available from: https://zakon.ru/blog/2018/05/21/kak_ya_pobedil_sudebnogo_robota-yurista__i_pochemu_eto_budet_dlitsya_nedolgo#comment_464411

The resolution of the Ninth Arbitration Court of Appeal of May 15, 2018 N 09АP-16416/2018. (2018). Available from: http://base.garant.ru/61623374/

Trautman, L.J. (2018). Bitcoin, Virtual Currencies, and the Struggle of Law and Regulation to Keep Pace, 102 Marq. L. Rev. 447. Available from: htts://scholarship.law.marquett.edu/mulr/vol102/iss2/5

Tyler, J. (2019) Legal Personhood for Artificial Intelligence, Utah Valley University (2019). Available from: htts://works.bepress.com/tyjaynes/1/

Wright, R.G. (2019). The Constitutional Rights of Advanced Robots (and of Human Beings), 71 Ark. L. Rev. 613 Available from: htts://scholarworks.uark.edu/alr/vol71/iss3/2

Ying, H. (2019). Robot Criminals, 52 U. Mich. J. L. Reform 487 (2019). Available from: htts://repository.law.umich.edu/mjlr/vol52/iss2/5

Zahadat, N. (2019). Digital Forensics. A Need for Credentials and Standards, Journal of Digital Forensics, Security and Law, 14(1), 3. Available from: htts://commons.erau.edu/jdfsl/vol14/iss1/3

Publicado
2019-09-30
Cómo citar
Vasiliev Anton, & Pechatnova Yylia. (2019). Impacto de la inteligencia artificial en la esfera legal. Religación. Revista De Ciencias Sociales Y Humanidades, 4(19), 115-121. Recuperado a partir de http://revista.religacion.com/index.php/about/article/view/514