Instituto político del Estado en el contexto del análisis histórico y tipológico

  • Valentin Ya. Lyubashits Southern Federal University
  • Nikolay V. Razuvaev Russian academy of national economy and public service
  • Irina E. Abramova Rostov state medical University
  • Natalya V. Fedorova Don State Technical University
  • Benedyk Y. S. Yaroslav Mudry National Law University
Palabras clave: análisis histórico, tipológico, estructuras de potestarny, historicismo, paradigma de Kondratiyev.

Resumen

El artículo está dedicado a los problemas de estructuración de la historia creada por el estado teniendo en cuenta la variedad de formas sociales, políticas, diversas velocidades de génesis política. Se consideran problemas de asignación de etapas de desarrollo de las organizaciones políticas (estadidad) teniendo en cuenta la incertidumbre de las unidades generales del análisis, términos y conceptos de paradigmas bastante diversos de estructuración y periodización de la historia. Se muestra que la fuerza decisiva que causa la transformación de todos los demás sectores públicos es el crecimiento, la distribución y la deducción de una posición dominante de los más efectivos en las condiciones de este período de un régimen político.

Descargas

La descarga de datos todavía no está disponible.

Citas

Adriana, J., & Holanda, M. (2016). Brasilia’s Database Administrators. Journal of Information Systems Engineering & Management, 1(3), 149-157. https://doi.org/10.20897/lectito.201630

Ali, Y., Nusair, M. M., Alani, F., Khan, F. R., & Al Badi, L. (2017). Employment in the Private Sector in Oman: Sector-Based Approach for Localization. Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews, eISSN, 2395-6518.

Bytyak, Y. P., Yakovyuk, I. V., Tragniuk, O., Komarova, T. V., & Shestopal, S. S. (2017). The State Sovereignty and Sovereign Rights: Correlation Problem. Man in India, 97(23), 577-588.

Chase-Dunn K., Hall T., (2001). One, two, many world systems//world Time. Issue 2. Novosibirsk.

Claessen, H.J.M., Oosten, J.G. (1996). Ideology and the formation of early states. Leiden.

Claessen, HJ.M., Velde, P. van de. Smith, M.E. (1985). Development and decline; The evolution of sociopolitical organization. South Hadley (MA).

Goudsblom, J. (1996). Human History and Long-Term Social Processes: Toward a Synthesis of Chronology and Phaseology//Goudsblom J., Jones E.L, Mennell S.The Course of Human History. Economic Growth, Social Process and Civilization. M.E. Sharpe, N.Y.; L., P.20.

Ilyin, M. V., (1999). Choice of Russia: myth, destiny, culture//Via Regia. No. 1-2.

Lyubashits, V. Y. (1993). General theory of the state. P.1. Origin, essence and nature of the state. Rostov-on-Don,

Lyubashits, V., (2017). Sociocultural measurement of institutional and functional characteristics of public-power interactions//Lyubashits V., Mamychev A., Uvarova G., Artyukhin O. Man in India. T. 97. No. 23. Page 461-470.

Lyubashits, V.Y., Mamychev, A.Y., Shalyapin, S.O., Filippova, M.K. (2016). Prognostic problems of the public and power organization of the Russian society: Archetypes and sociocultural basis of functioning and development. International Review of Management and Marketing 6 (6). P.85-89.

Mamychev, A. Yu., Kachurova, S.V., Shestopal, S.S. (2016). Socio-cultural (archetypal) basis of transformation of public power organizations: forms and directions. Baltic Humanitarian Journal, T5, No. 4 (17), 375-380.

Martyshin, O. V. (2003). History of political and legal doctrines / Under the editorship of O. V. Martyshin. M.

Marx, K., Engels, F. (1981). Compositions. M, 1955-1981. T.13.

Mordovtsev, A. Yu., Mamychev, A. Yu., Shestopal, S.S. (2017). Russian statehood as a particular civilizational and legal mentality type. Baltic Humanitarian Journal. 2017. T. 6. No. 4(21)

Mordovtsev, A., Zhinkin, S., Mamychev, A., Yakovyuk, I., Shestopal, S. (2017). Legal Mentality in National Cultural Space: Characteristics of the ERA of Change (Church Schism of the 17th Century). Man in India, 97(23), 295-309.

Mordovtsev, A.Y., Mamychev A. Yu., Shestopal S.S., (2017). Essential content of Russian legal mentality//Azimuth of Scientific Research: Economics and Administration. 2017. T. 6. No. 4(21)

Pashinsky, V. M., (1994). Recurrence in the history of Russia (a look from a position of social ecology)//the Policy. No. 4.

Popper, K. (1993). Poverty of history science. M.

Room van, C., (1984). Historians and Long Waves//Long Waves in the World Economy. L., R.237-244.

Rozov, N. S., (1992). Structure of civilizations and tendencies of world development. Novosibirsk.

Rozov, N. S., (1995). Possibility of theoretical history: answer to Karl Popper's call//philosophy Questions. 1995. No. 12. Page 55-69;

Rozov, N. S., (1999). Structure of social ontology: on the way to synthesis of macrohistorical paradigms//Questions of philosophy. 1999. No. 2. Page 3-22;

Rozov, N. S., (2001). Development and approbation of a method of theoretical history / Scientific editor N. S. Rozov. Novosibirsk, 2001; etc.

Rozov, N. S., (2001). On the way to reasonable periodization of world history. Structures of history//world Time. Issue 2. Novosibirsk, 2001. Page 247.

Umov, V. I., Lapkin V. V. (1992). Kondratyevsky cycles and Russia: forecast of reforms//Policy. No. 4.

Publicado
2019-09-30
Cómo citar
Valentin Ya. Lyubashits, Nikolay V. Razuvaev, Irina E. Abramova, Natalya V. Fedorova, & Benedyk Y. S. (2019). Instituto político del Estado en el contexto del análisis histórico y tipológico. Religación. Revista De Ciencias Sociales Y Humanidades, 4(19), 1114-1120. Recuperado a partir de http://revista.religacion.com/index.php/about/article/view/745