Noisy behavior of residents of an apartment building as a matter of neighborly law (the case of relationship between dog owners and neighbors)
Abstract
The aim of this study is to examine in detail such a segment of neighborhood law as the silence related relations of neighbors in an apartment building. Neighborhood law, despite its long existence in the legal systems of foreign countries, remains unspecific in the regulation of relations between apartment owners, while in Russia neighborhood law has not received due attention from the federal legislator. We believe that competition between public and private law on this issue should be resolved in favor of private law. Civil law in the current state contains a great potential for the regulation of neighborhood relations and protection of neighborhood rights. The possibilities of civil law in this area should be expanded in the course of the forthcoming reform of property legislation. It is necessary to continue the development of neighborhood law in Russia.
Downloads
Metrics
References
buildings and in territory of inhabited building. The decision of the State Committee of Sanitary and Epidemiological Surveillance of the Russian Federation. Consultant Plus Reference System.
Altai Regional Legislative Assembly. (2017). Available from: http://www.akzs.ru/cache/6059-3a-537-2017sOprVSRFot04.10.17.pdf/ (Accessed on 06.08.2019).
Animal Housing and Protection in the Altai Territory. (2017). Law of Altai Krai. № 96-ЗС. Available from: http://docs.cntd.ru/document/450377806/ (Accessed on 06.08.2019).
Black’s Law Dictionary. (2009). B. A. Garner. (Ed.). St. Paul: West Group.
Civil Code of Czech Republic. (2005). Ministry of Justice. Available from: http://obcanskyzakonik.justice.cz/images/pdf/Civil-Code.pdf/
Civil Code of the Russian Federation. (2005). Consultant Plus Reference System.
Civil Code. (2008). Book 3: Patrimonial law: draft of the Supreme Editorial Commission for drafting the Civil Code (with explanations extracted from the works of the Editorial Commission). Moscow. Walters Klover.
Code of Administrative Offences of the Russian Federation. (2018). Consultant Plus Reference System.
Constitution of the Russian Federation. (1993). Consultant Plus Reference System.
Decision of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation. (2008). Case 59-G08-12. Garant Reference System.
Decision of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation. (2011a). Case 64-G11-36. Garant Reference System.
Decision of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation. (2011b). Case 55-APG14-11. Garant Reference System.
Decision of Supreme Court of the Russian Federation. (2012a). Case 81-APG12-1. Garant Reference System.
Decision of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation. (2012b). Case 46-APG12-14. Garant Reference System.
Decision of the Nagatinsky District Court of Moscow. (2014). Case 2-5163/2014.
Decision of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation. (2015a). Case 74-APG15-15. Garant Reference System.
Decision of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation. (2015b). Case 46-APG15-39. Garant Reference System.
Decision of the Sverdlovsk District Court. (2015c). Case 2-2309/2015. Available from: https://sudact.ru/regular/doc/ZVvAG8SRKooH/ (Accessed 06.08.2019).
Decision of the Severouralsk City Court. (2016). Case 2-788/2016. Available from: https://sudact.ru/regular/doc/fpTacz6gnJdj/ (Accessed 06.08.2019).
Decision of the Leninsky District Court of Barnaul. (2017a). Case 12-100/17. Archive of the Leninsky District Court of Barnaul.
Decision of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation. (2017b). Case 10-APG17-1. Garant Reference System.
Decision of the Altai Territory Court. (2017c). Case 3a-537/2017. Available from: http://www.akzs.ru/cache/6059-3a-537-2017sOprVSRFot04.10.17.pdf/ (Accessed on 06.08.2019).
Decision of the Judicial Collegium for Administrative Cases of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation. (2017d). Case 51-APG17-16. Available from: http://www.akzs.ru/cache/6059-3a-537-2017sOprVSRFot04.10.17.pdf/ (Accessed on 06.08.2019).
Decision of the Kalininsky District Court of Ufa, Republic of Bashkortostan. (2017e). Case 2-5744/2017. Garant Reference System.
Decision of the Mozhaisk City Court. (2017f). Case 2-1098/2017. Available from: https://jur24pro.ru/reshenie-sudov/208613/ (Accessed 06.08.2019).
Decision of the Leninsky District Court of Barnaul. (2019a). Case 12-123/2019. Archive of the Leninsky District Court of Barnaul.
Decision of the Leninskiy District Court of Barnaul. (2019b). Case 12-122/2019. Archive of the Leninskiy District Court of Barnaul.
Decision of the Leninsky District Court of Barnaul. (2019c). Case 12-121/2019. Archive of the Leninsky District Court of Barnaul.
Decision of the Leninsky District Court of Barnaul. (2019d). Case 12-218/2019. Archive of the Leninsky District Court of Barnaul.
Decision of the Leninsky District Court of Barnaul. (2019e). Case 12-240/19. Archive of the Leninsky District Court of Barnaul.
Decision of the Tchaikovsky City Court of the Perm Territory. (2019f). Case 12-342/12. Garant Reference System.
Emelkina, I.A. (2016). Institute of Restriction of Property Rights in favor of neighbors (neighborhood law) in Russian law and in the law of certain European countries. Civil Law Herald, 2, 79-112.
Emelkina, I.A., Syubaeva, Y.D. (2017). Neighborhood law in civil law of Germany, Austria, Switzerland, France, USA: essence and regularities of development. Social and Political Sciences, 6, 70–73.
German Civil Code. (2008). Moscow. Walters Klover.
GOST R 56391-2015. (2015). National Standard of the Russian Federation. Services for non-productive animals. Housing of non-productive animals in urban conditions. General Requirements. Rosstandart order No. 268. Consultant Plus Reference System.
Hulsroj, P. (2006). To The Rescue, All Hands: The Good Neighbour Principle In International Law. (pp. 167–190). In J. Allain & S. Mullally (Eds.). The Irish Yearbook of International: Volume 1. London: Hart Publishing. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5040/9781472564269.ch-005
Human Rights Act. (1998). UK Legislation. Available from: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1998/42/enacted.
Hylton, K.N. (2015). Nuisance. Forthcoming in Encylopedia of Law and Economics. J. Backhaus (Ed.). Boston Univ. School of Law, Law and Economics Research Paper No. 14-60.
Kozlov, Y.M. (1999). Administrative law. Moscow. Lawyer.
Nolan, D. (2011a). A Tort Against Land: Private Nuisance as a Property Tort (pp. 459-490). D. Nolan and A. Robertson (Eds.). Rights and Private Law. Oxford. Hart Publishing.
Nolan, D. (2011b). Nuisance and Human Rights (pp. 165-194). In The Impact of the UK Human Rights Act on Private Law. David Hoffmann (Ed). Cambridge University Press.
Nolan, D. (2015). Nuisance, Planning and Regulation: The Limits of Statutory Authority (pp. 183-206). In Defences in Tort. Dyson, Goudkamp and Wilmot-Smith (Eds.). Oxford. Hart Publishing.
Novitskiy, I. (1924a). Neighborhood right (General limits of land plots use). Law and life. Books 7-8, 10–21.
Novitsky, I. (1924b). Neighborhood Law. Framework and meaning of the problem. Law and life. Book. 5-6, 3–12.
On administrative responsibility for committing offences in the territory of Altai Krai. (2002). Law of Altai Krai No. 46-ZS. Available from: http://docs.cntd.ru/document/940002330/ (Accessed on 06.08.2019).
On Amendments to Parts 1-4 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation. (2019). Draft Federal Law 7538-6. Available from: http://docs.cntd.ru/document/902339437/ (Accessed on 06.08.2019).
On approval of SanPiN 2.1.2.2645-10. (2010). Sanitary-and-epidemiologic requirements to living conditions in residential buildings and premises. Resolution of the Chief State Sanitary Doctor of the Russian Federation. Consultant Plus Reference System.
On ensuring silence and peace of citizens in the Altai Territory. (2017). Law of Altai Krai 95-ЗС. Available from: http://docs.cntd.ru/document/450377807/ (Accessed on 06.08.2019).
On environmental protection. (2002). Federal Law 7-FZ. Consultant Plus Reference System.
On Responsible Treatment of Animals and Amendments to Certain Legislative Acts of the Russian Federation. (2018). Federal Law 498-FZ. Consultant Plus Reference System.
On Sanitary and Epidemiological Welfare of the Population. (1999). Federal Law 52-FZ. Consultant Plus Reference System.
Scott, S. (2017). Recent Developments in case law regarding neighbor law and its influence on the concept of ownership. Heinonline. Available from: https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/stelblr16&i=445/
Shershenevich, G.F. (2001). Course of civil law. Tula. Autograph.
Squires, P. (2008). The criminalisation of nuisance. Policy Press.
The Max Planck encyclopedia of European private law. (2017). J. Basedow, K.J. Hopt, R. Zimmermann, A. Stier. (Eds.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tikhomirov, Yu.A. (2001). Administrative law and process: full course. Moscow.
Tlesarev, S. (2016). Tilly-Tilly, Tilly-bom is a new cat’s house. Housing law, 11, 43–52.
Van der Merve. (1998). For whom the bell tolls - a solution in neighbor law. Stellenbosch Law Review, 9, 35
