Parliamentarianism: concept, signs, and problems of development in Russia
Abstract
The article analyzes various ideas about the concept and features of parliamentarism. On the basis of the generalization of the legal literature, the following set of features of parliamentarism is denoted: 1) rule of law; 2) separation of powers; 3) participation of the parliament in bodies of executive, judicial and other branches of power; 4) accountability of the executive power to the parliament; 5) multiparty nature, the right to political opposition and ensuring the connection of the population with the state mechanism; 6) special status of the deputy with a free mandate and responsibility before the law; 7) independence of the parliament; 8) special status of the deputy with a free mandate and responsibility before the law. The concept of parliamentarism proposed to counteract state bureaucratization. We connected the idea of parliamentarism with the possibility of mitigating authoritarian tendencies in Russian political system.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Abraham, H.J. (1993). The Judicial Process. New York.
Alizoda, Z. (2012). To the question of the concept and features of parliamentarism. Constitutional and municipal law, 5, 34-45.
Allan, T.R.S. (2001). Constitutional Justice: A Liberal Theory of the Rule of Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Aloisi, R., Meernik, J. (2017). Judgment Day. New York.
Amiantov, A.A. (2007). Constitutional principles of parliamentarism. Constitutional and municipal law, 18.
Arzamaskin, N.N. (2006). Transformation of the form of government of the modern Russian state. Vestnik of Bashkir University, 3, 43-55.
Bachoff, O. (1959). Grundgesetz und Richtermacht. Tuebingen.
Bagehot, W. (1976). The English Constitution. Cambridge University Press.
Baglai, M.V. (2004). Constitutional Law of the Russian Federation.Moscow.
Belknap, M.R. (1999). Constitutional Law as Creative Problem Solving: Could the Warren Court Have Ended the Vietnam War? California Western Law Review, 36(1).
Bogdanova, N.A. (2003). Parliamentary law in the system of the constitutional law. Parliamentary procedures: problems of Russia and foreign experience.Moscow.
Bondar, N.S. (2013). Concept of “living” (judicial) constitutionalism: methodology of research in the light of the practice of constitutional justice. Theory and practice of Russian constitutionalism: a collection of reports of the scientific-practical conference devoted to the 75th anniversary of the birth of academician O.E. Kutafin. Vol. 2. Moscow.
Bourdon, J., Pontier, J.-M., Ricci, J.-Cl. (1980). Driot constitutionel et institutions politique. Economica.
Chaplygina, A.Yu. (2013). Manifestations of political corruption in Russia in the conditions of transformation of the political regime and the crisis of the 90s. State power and local self-government, 1.
Chirkin, V.E. (1990). Separation of powers: social and legal aspects. Soviet state and law, 8.
Chirkin, V.E. (2001). Constitutional Law of Foreign Countries.Moscow.
Constitutional (state) law of foreign countries. (2000). Volumes 1-2. General part. Moscow.
Constitutional justice in Lithuania. (2003). Vilnius.
Crowe, J. (2007). Judicial Activism and Restraint. In Encyclopedia of the Supreme Court. D. Schultz. (Ed.). New York.
Dicey, A. V. (1982). An Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.
Evseev, B.S. (2014). Constitution, power and freedom in Russia: Experience of the synthetic research. Moscow.
Egorov, S.A. (1987) Modern science of the constitutional law in the USA.Moscow.
Fedorova, Yu.G. (2014). Institute of the Parliamentary Investigation in the Russian Federation.Moscow.
Filippova, N.A. (2009). Representation of the public interests in the federal state: peculiarities of the Russian national model. Ekaterinburg.
Friedman, L. (1992). Introduction to American Law. Moscow.
Gabrichidze, B.N., Eliseev, B.P., Chernyavskiy, A.G. (2003). Constitutional law of modern Russia.Moscow.
Goldford, D.J. (2005). The American Constitution and the Debate Over Originalism. Cambridge University Press.
Grafsky, V.G. (1991). Article by Fowler L.L., McCluire R.D. “Political ambition: who decides to run for Congress? Social sciences abroad. Series 4. State and law, 1.
Hamilton, A., Madison, J., Jay, J. (2009). The Federalist papers. Palgrave Macmillan.
Harutyunyan, A.A. (2013). Constitutionalism: Problems of post-Soviet reality. Moscow.
Hesse, K. (1981). Fundamentals of the constitutional order of the Federal Republic of Germany. Moscow.
Howard, D.A.E. (1992). Constitutionalism. Rule of Law: Collection, Moscow.
Jacquet, J.-P. (2002). Constitutional Law and Political Institutions. Moscow.
Jarass, H.D. (2002). Grundgesetz fuer die Bundesrepublik Deutschland: Kommentar von H.D. Jaras und B. Pieroth, 6. Aufl. Muenchen.
Kolobov, O.A., Kornilov, A.A., Sergun, A.A. (1991). Parliamentarism: foreign experience. Nizhny Novgorod.
Kondrashev, A.A. (2012). Peculiarities of the formation of the Russian political system in the context of the characteristics of the state regime. Constitutional and Municipal Law, 5.
Kotelevskaya, I.V. (1997). Modern Parliament. State and Law, 3.
Kramskoy, V.V. (2010). To a question on definition of the concept “parliamentarism”. Constitutional and municipal law, 7, 64-70.
Kramskoy, V.V. (2013). Parliamentaryism and Form of Government: Theoretical, Legal and Methodological Features of the Research. Constitutional and Municipal Law, 9.
Krylov, B.S. (1998). Power sharing: system of checks and balances. Journal of Russian Law, 6.
Lafitsky, V.I. (1998). Fundamentals of the constitutional order of the USA.Moscow.
Large legal dictionary. (2004). A.Ya. Sukharev, V.E. Krutskikh. (Eds.).Moscow.
Levin, I.D. (1960). Modern bourgeois science of the state law.Moscow.
Libertan, E. (1974). Bundestagsparteien im politischen Machtmechanismus der BRD. Berlin.
Locke, D. (1988). Two treatises on the board. Vol. 3. Moscow: Mysl.
Marchenko, M.N. (2008). Legal Systems of the Modern World.Moscow.
Marchenko, M.N. (2009). State and law in the conditions of globalization.Moscow.
Marshall, G. (1980). Constitutional Theory. Cambridge University Press.
Martinoff, M. (2002). To understand why Parliament no longer works, look at how we pick party leaders. Report Newsmagazine (Alberta Edition), 8, 25. Cherkasov, A.I. (1994). Legal regulation of political parties activity in India (Scientific and analytical review). Social and human sciences. Foreign literature. Series 4. State and law, 4.
Maunz, Th. (1980). Deutsches Staatsrecht. Munchen.
Mironov, O.O. (1996). Origins of the Russian parliamentarism. Representative power, 4-5, 67-75.
Mishin, A.A. (1996). Constitutional (state) law of foreign countries. Moscow.
Modern bourgeois state law. Critical essays. (1985). Main institutions. V. 2. Moscow.
Modern dictionary of foreign words.Moscow, 1999.
Modern Parliament: Theory, World Experience, Russian Practice. (2005). O.N. Bulakov. (Ed.).Moscow.
Mogunova, M.A. (2001). Scandinavian parliamentarism: theory and practice.Moscow.
Mogunova, M.A. (2008). Parliamentarism: concept, essence, principles. Public law research. Yearbook of the Center for Public Law Studies, 3 23-27.
Montesquieu, S. (1955). On the spirit of laws. Selected works.Moscow.
Moore, J.N. (1992). Rule of Law: Overview. Rule of Law. Collection. Moscow.
Onishko, N.V. (1999). Ideological and theoretical foundations of Russian parliamentarism. St. Petersburg.
Osavelyuk, A.M. (2013). Principle of protection of minority rights and the rule of law. In Problems of constitutional development of the Russian Federation: collection of articles dedicated to the 90th anniversary of Prof. B.S. Krylov. V.I. Fadeev. (Ed.).Moscow.
Parliamentary Law of Russia. (1999).Moscow.
Parliamentary law. (2006).Moscow.
Polovnev A.V. (2015). Trust in state institutions: Russia in the context of pan-European trends. Vestnik of Moscow State Linguistic University, 2(713).
Problems of the general theory of law and state. (1999). Moscow.
Romanov, R.M. (1998). Concept and essence of parliamentarism. Social and Political Journal, 4.
Rumyantseva, V.G., Gulyaeva, E.A. (2006). Parliamentarism: problems of scientific comprehension of the concept and practice of institutional implementation. State power and local self-government, 12, 39-47.
Russian Parliamentary Law. (2006). Moscow.
Rybkin, I.P. (1995). Formation and development of parliamentarism in Russia. Thesis of Doctoral Dissertation.Moscow.
Sajo, A. (2011). Constitutional Sentiments. New Haven, CT; L.
Sajo, A., Uitz, R. (2017). The Constitution of Freedom: An Introduction to Legal Constitutionalism. Oxford, 2017.
Sampbell, J. (1996). The Legal Theory of Ethical Positivism. Routledge.
Sampson, A. (1975). New Anatomy of Britain.Moscow.
Sedegov, A.V. (2009). Separation of powers as a criterion of the state form classification. Society and law, 1.
Serov, K.N. (2007). Socio-economic policy of the state and political regime: some problems of interrelation. Legal world, 4.
Shekhovtsov, V.A. (2002). Development of the Russian Parliamentarism. Vladivostok.
State and Law Theory. (2007).Moscow.
Trautmann, H. (1975). Innerparteiliche Demokratie im Parteienstaat. Berlin.
Usanov V.E. (2006). Parliamentarism in Russia: Constitutional and Legal Basis of Development and Activity. Thesis of Doctoral Dissertation.Moscow.
Von Sydow, B. (1997)l Parlamentarismen i Sverige. Utveckling och utformning till 1945. Stockholm.
Vystropova, A.V. Acts of the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation. Thesis of Doctoral Dissertation. Saratov.
Waldron, J. (1998). Judicial Review and the Conditions of Democracy. Journal of Political Philosophy, 6, 4.
Zorkin, V.D. (2015). Civilization of law and development of Russia.Moscow.
