The psychological aspect of auditor and dysfunctional conduct on the government budget supervision
Abstract
This study aims to examine the effect of psychological aspects of dysfunctional behavior at the stage of the government budget examination. The psychological aspect that occurs in the auditing profession uses the proxy of time budget pressure. The sample in this study is the government internal supervisor in Indonesia, represented in this case by the East Java Development Finance Control Board (BPKP). Selected respondents were 39 people whose data were used for the analysis. Questionnaires of 21 questions were distributed directly to measure both variables. Hypotheses were tested using simple regression. The results showed that time budget pressure had a significant effect on dysfunctional behavior
Downloads
Metrics
References
Adi Kurniawan IY. (2005) The Effect of Education, Experience and Training to Government Auditor Profesiionalism: Case of Surabaya City Auditor. In: Konferensi Nasional Akuntansi: Peran Akuntan dalam Mewujudkan Good Corporate Governance. Jakarta: Universitas Trisakti.
BAMBER EM, BYLINSKI JH. (1987) The effects of the planning memorandum, time pressure and individual auditor characteristics on audit managers’ review time judgments. Contemp Account Res;4(1):127–43.
Bowrin AR, Ii JK. (2010) Time pressure, task complexity, and audit effectiveness. Manag Audit J. 2010;25(2):160–81.
Donnelly DP, Quirin JJ, O’Bryan D. (2003) Auditor Acceptance of Dysfunctional Audit Behavior: An Explanatory Model Using Auditors Personal Characteristics [Internet]. Vol. 15, Behavioral Research in Accounting. 2003. p. 87–110. Available from: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ecn&AN=0645959&site=ehost-live&scope=site
Hapsari RE. (2016) The Influence of Independence, Time Budget Pressure, Professional Skepticism, Ethics and Auditor Working Experience to Audit Quality of Government Local Auditor. J Akunt Manaj.
Herliansyah Y, Ilyas M. (2006)The Auditor Experience and Unrelevance Audi Evidence in case of Auditor Judgement. Simp Nas Akunt IX;1–15.
Mardiasmo. (2002)The Elaboration of Public Sector Accounting Reform: A Critical Review on Local Government Accounting Syste. J Akunt Audit Indones;6(1):63–82.
Rozmita Dewi Yuniarti R ET. (2015) The influence of Experience and Professinalism of forensic Accountant to Audit Quality. J Ris Akunt dan Keuang Progr Stud Akunt Fak Pendidik Ekon dan Bisnis Univ Pendidik Indones [Internet]. 2015;3(1):617–31. Available from: http://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/JRAK/article/view/6608
Svanberg J, Öhman P. (2012). Auditors’ time pressure: does ethical culture support audit quality? Manag Audit J [Internet]. Available from: http://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/10.1108/MAJ-10-2012-0761
Thornton JM, Reinstein A & Miller CL. (2007) Self-serving bias, respondent knowledge, and perceptions of non-audit services’ impact on auditor independence. Res Prof Responsib Ethics Account;12:173–202.
