Social Sciences and Humanistic Therapeutic Orientations: Approaches for Interdisciplinary Work in Contexts of Social Suffering

  • Minerva Rojas Ruiz Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México - México
Keywords: sociology, dialogue, humanistic psychotherapy, therapeutic practice.

Abstract

This paper presented similitudes and differences between profound and therapeutic interview, and the accent in understanding the body, as meeting points between Social Sciences —specifically Sociology— and the therapeutic orientations based on Person Cen-tered and Gestalt therapies. Then, some contributions of Social Sciences to the theory and practice of therapy were developed, basing on the sociological theory of fields, and the concepts of habitus and symbolic violence that stem from it. Finally, specific actions axis, in which both therapy and Social Sciences can support each other, were presented. It is concluded the necessity of establishing interdisciplinary workgroups, in order to carry out social interventions that include both comprehension of the social background of personal suffering and conducts, and the exercise of empathy and horizontality, with the aim to contribute to the recuperation of individual and group agency in contexts of violence, social discomposure and social suffering.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biography

Minerva Rojas Ruiz, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México - México

Candidata a doctora en Ciencias Políticas y Sociales, por la Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM). Docente de maestría en el Instituto Humanista de Psicoterapia Gestalt (IHPG-México). Profesora de licenciatura en la Facultad de Filosofía y Letras de la UNAM

References

Alonso, L. E. (1998). La mirada cualitativa en sociología. Una aproximación interpretativa. Madrid: Fundamentos.

Bourdieu, P. (1991). “Estructuras habitus, prácticas”. En El sentido práctico. Madrid: Taurus.

__________ (1999a). La miseria del mundo. México: FCE.

__________ (1999b) Meditaciones pascalianas. Barcelona: Anagrama.

__________ (2008). Cuestiones de sociología. Madrid: Akal.

Bourdieu, P., Passeron J-C. (1996). La reproducción. Elementos para una teoría del sistema de enseñanza. Barcelona: Fontamara.

Bourdieu, P., Wacquant, L. (1995) Respuestas. Por una antropología reflexiva. México: Grijalbo.

Elias, N. (2009). El proceso de la civilización. Investigaciones sociogenéticas y psicogenéticas. México: FCE.

Goodman, P. (2011). “What must be the Revolutionary Program?”. En

Taylor Stoehr (ed.). The Paul Goodman Reader. Oakland: PM Press.

Mills, C.W. (2005). La imaginación sociológica. México: FCE.

Robine, J.-M. (1999). Contacto y relación en psicoterapia. Reflexiones sobre terapia gestalt. Santiago de Chile: Cuatro Vientos.

Tárrega, X. (2012). “De la autosuficiencia a la interdependencia”. Figura/Fondo no. 32. México: IHPG.

Tilly, C. (1983). Big Structures, Large Processes, Huge Comparisons. Michigan: Univesrity of Michigan.

Published
2016-09-30
How to Cite
Rojas Ruiz, M. (2016). Social Sciences and Humanistic Therapeutic Orientations: Approaches for Interdisciplinary Work in Contexts of Social Suffering. Religación, 1(3), 103-118. Retrieved from https://revista.religacion.com/index.php/religacion/article/view/53