Legal vacuum in the integral organic penal code with respect to the need for the defendant to appear for the taking of the anticipated testimony
Abstract
The present research topic is crucial due to the violations currently facing the criminal process in Ecuador, especially in relation to anticipated testimony. The Comprehensive Organic Criminal Code (COIP) does not regulate the appearance of the suspect in this procedure, which seriously affects his rights, including the principle of contradiction and the right to defense. This lack of regulation compromises the integrity of the process and the fundamental constitutional and legal guarantees. The study seeks to demonstrate this violation and propose a reform to the COIP to correct this deficiency. The objective of this study is to demonstrate the violation of due process in the context of anticipated testimony, due to the absence of the suspect’s appearance. It is intended to demonstrate how this situation affects the principle of contradiction, immediacy and the right to defense, through the analysis of legislation and jurisprudence. The ultimate goal is to propose reforms to the COIP that correct this deficiency and restore the integrity of the criminal process in Ecuador. A qualitative approach was used for this study, employing inductive-deductive, analytical-synthetic and dogmatic-legal methods. The inductive-deductive method made it possible to analyze the regulations and jurisprudence to identify patterns and deduce conclusions about the violation of the suspect’s rights. The analytical-synthetic method facilitated a detailed understanding of the current situation and the identification of potential solutions. Finally, the dogmatic-legal method was used to examine the legal regulations and their application in practice, identifying deficiencies requiring reform. There is a serious violation of the suspect’s rights in the Ecuadorian criminal process, specifically in relation to anticipated testimony. The suspect’s failure to appear for this procedure compromises the principle of contradiction, immediacy and the right to defense, both for the suspect and the victim. This situation demonstrates the urgent need to reform the COIP to ensure a fair and equitable criminal process. It is imperative to propose a reform to the Comprehensive Organic Criminal Code to address the lack of regulation on the appearance of the suspect in the anticipated testimony. This reform is crucial to restore the integrity of the criminal process in Ecuador and guarantee respect for the fundamental rights of all parties involved.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Asamblea Nacional Constituyente. (2008). Constitución de la República del Ecuador. Registro Oficial 449. https://acortar.link/u2Y3J
Asamblea Nacional Constituyente. (2014). Código Orgánico Integral Penal. Registro Oficial S. 180. https://acortar.link/OYTZ5Z
Bernal Vallejo, H., & Hernández Rodríguez, S. (2001). El debido proceso disciplinario. Biblioteca Jurídica Dike.
Corte Constitucional del Ecuador. (2010, 02 de diciembre). Sentencia 031-10-SCN-CC, Casos Acumulados 0044-10-CN,0045-10-CN,0046-10-CNv0047-10-CN. https://acortar.link/L3TQGc
Corte Constitucional del Ecuador. (2014). Sentencia No. 002-14-SEP-CC. https://acortar.link/5X7n0K
Corte Constitucional del Ecuador. (2016, 06 de enero). Sentencia 005-16-SEP-CC, Caso 1221-14-EP. https://acortar.link/FUcZXD
Corte Constitucional del Ecuador. (2021, 09 de junio). Sentencia No. 3068-18-EP/21, 3068-18-EP. https://acortar.link/HF4lrk
Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos. (2015, 05 de octubre). Caso Ruano Torres y otros vs. El Salvador. https://www.corteidh.or.cr/docs/casos/articulos/seriec_303_esp.pdf
Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos. (2022). Cuadernillo de Jurisprudencia de la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos: Debido Proceso No. 12. https://bibliotecacorteidh.winkel.la/Product/ViewerProduct/1647#page=1
Corte Nacional de Justicia del Ecuador. (2018, 09 de febrer). Investigación previa–testimonio anticipado de la víctima. https://www.cortenacional.gob.ec/cnj/images/pdf/consultas_absueltas/Penales/iprevia/003.pdf
Corte Nacional de Justicia del Ecuador. (2019, 21 de noviembre). Investigación previa–testimonio anticipado, constancia de notificación al procesado. https://www.cortenacional.gob.ec/cnj/images/pdf/consultas_absueltas/Penales/iprevia/008.pdf
Durán-Chávez, C., & Fuentes-Aguila, M. (2021, Julio). El debido proceso penal y su constitucionalización en Ecuador. Polo del Conocimiento, 6(7), 1083-1103. http://doi.org/10.23857/pc.v6i7.2909
Pachay-Ortiz, R., Tamayo-Vásquez, F., & Pino-Loza, E. (2019). El testimonio anticipado de la víctima y la afectación de la igualdad ante la ley del procesado en el Ecuador. FIPCAEC, 4(2), 392-410. https://doi.org/10.23857/fipcaec.v4i4.142
Prado Falconí, F., & Sotomayor Plaza, J. (2022). Vulneración de la garantía del debido proceso en el derecho a la defensa del investigado, afectado por la toma del testimonio anticipado en delitos sexuales. Revista Metropolitana de Ciencias Aplicadas, 5(5), 90-95. https://remca.umet.edu.ec/index.php/REMCA/article/view/473
Sarango Aguirre, H. (2008, mayo). El Debido Proceso y el Principio de Motivación de las Resoluciones/Sentencias Judiciales [Tesis de maestría, Universidad Andina Simón Bolivar]. Repositorio Institucional. http://hdl.handle.net/10644/422
Save The Children. (2020, 25 de noviembr). ¿Qué es la revictimización y como evitarla?. https://www.infodigna.org/es/articles/4406339074199
Zabaleta Ortega, Y. (2017). La contradicción en materia probatoria, en el marco del proceso penal colombiano. CES Derecho, 8(1), 172-190. http://dx.doi.org/10.21615/cesder.8.1.9
Copyright (c) 2024 Viviana Alexandra Pauta Polo, Ana Fabiola Zamora Vázquez
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.