The paradoxes of research audiences in sub-Saharan Africa

Simon Vurayai

doi:10.46652/rgn.v9i40.1181

Simon Vurayai University of Johannesburg | South Africa http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9395-8880

DOI: https://doi.org/10.46652/rgn.v9i40.1181

Palabras clave: Compromiso de la comunidad; consumo de conocimientos; paradojas; públicos de la investigación; comunidad subsahariana.

Resumen

El objetivo de este estudio es analizar los enigmas que encuentran los investigadores en el consumo de conocimientos en la comunidad subsahariana. Para ello se empleó como metodología un estudio sistemático de revisión bibliográfica. El estudio puso de manifiesto que, a pesar de que el público investigador y la comunidad subsahariana en general tienen derecho a acceder y conocer los resultados de las investigaciones de las que son destinatarios, rara vez acceden a los trabajos académicos. Algunos de los retos que se examinaron en este estudio son la lengua, la alfabetización, la financiación y la pobreza, la duración de la investigación, la comunicación académica, el imperialismo cultural, la brecha digital y la publicación depredadora. El estudio recomienda que los países subsaharianos movilicen y recauden más fondos para modernizar el funcionamiento de las bibliotecas, impulsar la infraestructura de las TIC y comercializar la investigación africana para mejorar su visibilidad y su consumo por parte de los destinatarios y la comunidad.

Descargas

La descarga de datos todavía no está disponible.

##plugins.generic.paperbuzz.metrics##

Cargando métricas ...

Biografía del autor/a

Simon Vurayai, University of Johannesburg | South Africa

Senior postdoctoral research fellow in the Ali Mazrui Centre for Higher Education Studies, Faculty of Education, University of Johannesburg in South Africa. He holds a Ph.D. in Sociology of Education. He taught in the Sociology of Education in the Department of Educational Foundations at Great Zimbabwe University, Zimbabwe. His research interests are, gender studies, social justice, problems in education, sociology of knowledge, sociology of mass media, sociology of development and poverty studies.

Citas

Anderson, R. (2018). What Is the Role of the Library? Scholarly Communication. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/wentk/9780190639440.003.0007

Carter, K., & Aulette, J. (2016). Publish, don’t perish: Ten tips. English Teaching Forum, 54(1), 20-28. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1094813

Chisenga, R. (2019). Knowledge production for the Africa we want. Opinion. https://www.policycenter.ma/opinion/knowledge-production-africa-we-want#.Xzq-ZegzaM8

Daus, M., Albright, K., & Jones, C. D. (2023). Disseminating results to participants: An obligation to those who make research possible. Journal of Hospital Medicine, 18(9), 853–855. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhm.13064

Ekeanyanwu, N. T. (2022). Indigenous cultures in the era of globalisation. Communicare: Journal for Communication Studies in Africa, 28(1), 126–143. https://doi.org/10.36615/jcsa.v28i1.1703

Ezema, I. J. (2010). Globalisation, information revolution and cultural imperialism in Africa. Information, Society and Justice, 3(1), 11-22.

Forero, D. A., Oermann, M. H., Manca, A., Deriu, F., Mendieta-Zerón, H., Dadkhah, M., Bhad, R., Deshpande, S. N., Wang, W., & Cifuentes, M. P. (2018). Negative Effects of “Predatory” Journals on Global Health Research. Annals of Global Health, 84(4), 584-589. https://doi.org/10.29024/aogh.2389.

Lynch, K. (2006). Neo-liberalism and marketisation: The implications for higher education. European Educational Research Journal, 5(1), 1-17.

Kamwendo, G. (2014). Language policies of South African accredited journals in humanities and social sciences: Are they speaking the language of transformation? Alternation, 21(2), 207–222.

Maikaba, B., & Msughter, A. E. (2019). Digital Media and Cultural Globalisation: The Fate of African Value System. Humanities and Social Sciences, 7(6), 214-220. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.hss.20190706.15

Mertler, C. A. (2023). Disseminating Your Action Research. Routledge.

Mfutso-Bengo, J., Ndebele, P., & Masiye, F. (2008). Disseminating research results to research

participants and their communities. Malawi Medical Journal, 20(2). https://doi.org/10.4314/mmj.v20i2.10959

Mushemeza, E. D. (2016). Opportunities and Challenges of Academic Staff in Higher Education in Africa. International Journal of Higher Education, 5(3). http://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v5n3p236

Ngulube, P. (2012). Revitalising and preserving endangered indigenous languages in South Africa through writing and publishing. South African Journal of Libraries and Information Science, 78(10), 1-43.

Nyamnjoh, F. B. (2004). From publish or perish to publish and perish: What ‘Africa’s 100 best books’ tell us about publishing Africa. Journal of Asian and African Studies, 39(5), 331–355. https://doi. org/10.1177/0021909604051185

Peter, A. M. (2003). Challenges of quantitative research and the possibility of triangulation as an alternative. Department of Political Science Federal University.

Queirós, A., Faria, D., & Almeida, F. (2017). Strengths and limitations of qualitative and quantitative research methods. European Journal of Education Studies, 3(9), 369-386. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.887089

Romolini, A., Fissi, S., & Gori, E. (2017). Exploring Integrated Reporting Research: Results and

Perspectives. International Journal of Accounting and Financial Reporting, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.5296/ijafr.v7i1.1063

Rotich, C. D. (2011). The present and future growth of scholarly publishing in Africa. Inkanyiso, Jnl Hum & Soc Sci, 3(2), 131-139.

Siundu, G. (2020, February 12). Why publishing in Kiswahili can transform knowledge production on eastern Africa. Africa at LSE. https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/africaatlse/2020/02/12/publishing-kiswahili-transform-knowledge-production-eastern-africa/

Tar, U. A. (2010).Coming to terms with a wired world? Challenges of information technology in the developing world. Information, Society and Justice, 3(1), 1-9.

Tarkang, E. F., & Bain, L. E. (2019).The bane of publishing a research article in international journals by African researchers, the peer-review process and the contentious issue of predatory journals: a commentary. Pan African Medical Journal, 32, 119. http://doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2019.32.119.18351

Thrane, C. (2022). Doing Quantitative Research. Routledge.

Vurayai, S. (2023). From Academic Coconuts to Knowledge Custodians. In A. P. Ndofirepi, S. Vurayai, and G. Erima (eds.), Unyoking African University Knowledge (pp. 97–119). Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004548107_007

Vurayai, S., & Ndofirepi, A. P. (2020). ‘Publish or perish’: implications for novice African university scholars in the neoliberal era. African Identities, 20(2), 122–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/14725843.2020.1813084

Wilson, K., Kiuna, A., Lamptey, R., Veldsman, S., Montgomery, L., Neylon, C., Hosking, R., Huang, K., & Ozaygen, A. (2020). Open access and research dissemination in Africa. 24th International Conference on Electronic. https://doi.org/10.4000/proceedings.elpub.2020.20

Xia, J. (2021). Predatory Publishing. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003029335

Yeung, A., & Denicolo, P. (2022). Unethical Reporting of Results. Writing About and Disseminating Your Research. Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781071882146

Zamani, G., & Ebadi, S. (2023). Promoting Awareness, Reflection, and Dialogue to Deter Students’ Predatory Publishing. In P. Habibie, I. Fazel (eds.), Predatory Practices in Scholarly Publishing and Knowledge Sharing (pp. 198–213). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003170723-16