El impacto del Aprendizaje Integrado de Contenidos Lingüísticos (AICLE) en la capacidad de expresión oral en el aula de EFL de secundaria
Resumen
Muchos autores afirman que el doble enfoque de AICLE en la lengua y el contenido desarrolla el pensamiento crítico de orden superior, el compromiso cognitivo y fomenta la motivación. Surgido originalmente en Europa, la versatilidad y adaptabilidad de este enfoque condujo a una adopción más amplia en otras partes del mundo, lo que dio lugar a múltiples artículos empíricos y contextuales. El propósito de este estudio fue identificar el impacto de AICLE en el desarrollo de las habilidades del idioma inglés en el nivel secundario en América Latina para permitir a los estudiantes aprender un segundo idioma en un contexto significativo. Así, este estudio utiliza un método cualitativo descriptivo para analizar los estudios que se centran en los principales desafíos en la aplicación de AICLE en el nivel secundario, así como la forma en que se ha implementado en América Latina en la última década a través de diferentes e interactivas estrategias que permiten a los estudiantes aumentar la comunicación oral en contexto.
Descargas
##plugins.generic.paperbuzz.metrics##
Citas
Alam, M. A., & Ashrafuzzaman, M. (2018). Challenges of developing speaking skills through classroom interaction of EFL learners. Prime University Journal, 12(1), 45-67. https://acortar.link/CjrwmN
Alencar, J. C., Finardi, K., Silveira, N. (2016). First Aid and Waves in English as a Foreign Language: Insights from CLIL in Brazil. Electronic Journal for Research in Science & Mathematics Education (EJRSME), 20(3).
Argudo, J., Abad, M., Fajardo-Dack, T., & Cabrera, P. (2018). Analyzing a Pre-Service EFL Journal of Content and Language Integrated Learning, 11(1), 65-86. http://doi.org/10.5294/laclil.2018.11.1.4
Azparren-Legarre, M. P., & Bueno-Alastuey, M. C. (2023). Perceived Constraints of Contextual Factors on CLIL Teachers’ Effectiveness: Effect of a Training Course. Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated Learning, 15(2), e1525. https://doi.org/10.5294/laclil.2022.15.2.5
Ball, P. (2016) Using language(s) to develop subject competencies in CLIL-based practice. Revista de la AUH(39). http://hdl.handle.net/10017/28242
Banegas, D. L. (2022). Research into practice: CLIL in South America. Language Teaching, 55(3), 379-391. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444820000622
Banegas, D. (2021). CLIL in South America. Cambridge University Press, 55(3), 379–391. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444820000622
Banegas, D. (2020). Content and language integrated learning in Latin America 2008-2018: Ten years of research and practice. Gale Academic OneFile. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1262082.pdf
Banegas, D. L. (2016). Teachers develop CLIL materials in Argentina: A workshop experience. Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated Learning, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.5294/5460
Banegas, D. L. (2012). Integrating content and language in English language teaching in secondary education: Models, benefits, and challenges. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 2(1), 111-136. https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=98165
Banegas, D. L. (2012). CLIL teacher development: Challenges and experiences. Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated Learning, 5(1), 46-56. https://doi.org/10.5294/laclil.2012.5.1.4
Banegas, D. L., Poole, P. M., & Corrales, K. A. (2020). Content and language integrated learning in Latin America 2008-2018: Ten years of research and practice. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 10(2), 283-305. https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=877265
Barrios, E., & Acosta-Manzano, I. (2022). Primary students’ satisfaction with CLIL and perceived CLIL linguistic difficulty. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 43(7), 665-678. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2020.1759610
Benalcázar-Bermeo, J., & Ortega-Auquilla, D. (2019). Effects of the CLIL approach in oral production of english students in the second year of the united general baccalaureate at a high school in Cuenca, Ecuador. Revista Boletín Redipe, 8(12), 117-128. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1490-5188
Cenoz, N. V. (2021). Content and language integrated learning. Language Culture and Curriculum, Language, Cultural and Curriculum(35). https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2021.1910703
Collado, N. (2017). Implementación de la metodología CLIL en el aula de Educación. Repositori Unversiti JaumeI, 2.
Coyle, D. (2018). The place of CLIL in (bilingual) education. Theory Into Practice, 57(3), 166-176. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2018.1459096
Coyle, D., Hood, P., & Marsh, D. (2020). CLIL: Content and language integrated learning. TeachingEnglish. https://acortar.link/dI4TTT
Delliou, A., & Zafiri, M. (2016). Developing the speaking skills of students through CLIL. 5th Electronic International Interdisciplinary Conference. http://dx.doi.org/10.18638/eiic.2016.5.1.517
De Mejía, A. M. (2004). Bilingual education in Colombia: Towards an integrated perspective. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 7(5), 381-397. Doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13670050408667821
Domingos Sávio Pimentel Siqueira, J. L. (2018). Innovations and Challenges in CLIL. Routledge.
Duyen, N. H. (2023). Motivating factors in learning to speak English majored. International journal of social science and human research(6). https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v6-i4-45
Ellison, M., Morgado, M., & Coelho, M. (2022). CLIL across schools in Portugal. U. Porto. https://hdl.handle.net/10216/148409
Finardi, K. R., Leão, R., & Pinheiro, L. M. (2016). English in Brazil: insights from the analysis of language policies, internationalization programs, and the CLIL approach. Education and Linguistics Research, 2(1), 54-68. http://doi.org/10.5296/elr.v2i1.9150
Gimenez, T., El Kadri, M., & Calvo, L. C. S. (2018). English as a Lingua Franca in teacher education. De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501511776
Hemmi, C., & Banegas, D. L. (2021). CLIL: An overview. International perspectives on CLIL, 1-20. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-70095-9_1
Koopman, G. J., Skeet, J., & de Graaff, R. (2014). Exploring content teachers’ knowledge of language pedagogy: A report on a small-scale research project in a Dutch CLIL context. The Language Learning Journal, 42(2), 123-136. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2014.889974
Kovacikova, E. (2016). Development of speaking at primary schools through CLIL. X Linguae, (12), 17-26. http://doi.org/10.18355/XL.2019.12.02.02
Lasagabaster, D., & Doiz, A. (2016). CLIL students’ perceptions of their language learning process: delving into self-perceived improvement and instructional preferences. Language awareness, 25(1-2), 110-126. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2015.1122019
Lasabagaster, X. S. (2018). The impact of CLIL on pluriliteracy development and content learning in a rural multilingual setting: A longitudinal study. Sage Journal, 23. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168817754103
Legarre, M. P. A. (2022). The impact of CLIL teacher education on the beliefs of in-service CLIL teachers. Porta Linguarum Revista Interuniversitaria De Didáctica De Las Lenguas Extranjeras, 47-61. https://doi.org/10.30827/portalin.vi.21587
Marsh, D., & Díaz, W. (2020). A key development indicator matrix for systemizing CLIL in Higher education environments. Developing and Evaluating Quality Bilingual Practices in Higher Education, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781788923705-009
McDougald, J. (2016). CLIL Approaches in Education: Opportunities, Challenges, or Threats. Latin American Journal of Content and Language Integrated Learning, 9(2), 253-266. http://dx.doi.org/10.5294/laclil.2016.9.2.1
Mehisto, P. (2008). CLIL counterweights: Recognizing and decreasing disjuncture in CLIL. International CLIL Research Journal, 1(1), 93-119. http://hdl.handle.net/11162/64524
Mosquera Pérez, J. E. (2022). CLIL in Colombia: Challenges and Opportunities for its Implementation. GIST – Education and Learning Research Journal, 24, 7–24. https://doi.org/10.26817/16925777.1347
Paran, A. (2013). Content and language integrated learning: Panacea or policy borrowing myth? Applied Linguistics Review, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2013-0014
Pérez Cañado, M. L. (2018). The effects of CLIL on oral comprehension and production: a longitudinal case study. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 30(3) https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2017.1338717
Pérez, C. M. L. (2018). Innovations and challenges in CLIL teacher training. Theory Into Practice, 57(3), 212-221. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2018.1492238
Pérez, M. (2016). Are teachers ready for CLIL? Evidence from a European study. European Journal of Teacher Education, 39. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2016.1138104
Pistorio, M. I. (2009). Teacher training and competences for effective CLIL teaching in Argentina. Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated Learning, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.5294/laclil.2009.2.2.14
Reinoso, O. (2023). Content And Language Integrated Learning (Clil) To Develop Writing Skills In English. Revista Chakiñan de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, (20), 196-209. https://doi.org/10.37135/chk.002.20.11
Reinoso, O. (2022). El Aprendizaje Integrado de Contenidos y Lenguas Extranjeras para Desarrollar Habilidades de Redacción en Inglés. Chaquiñan https://doi.org/10.37135/chk.002.20.11
Rodriguez Bonces, M. (2011). CLILL: Colombia leading into content language learning. ÍKALA, Revista de lenguaje y cultura, 16(28), 79-89. http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?pid=S0123-34322011000200004&script=sci_arttext
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. ELSEVIER, 104. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296319304564
Vásquez, K. C. (2019). Contextualized activities to promote cultural awareness: under the umbrella of CLIL and PBL in English as a foreign language. EDUNOVATIC, 485.
Velásquez-Cedeño, K. A., & Argudo-Serrano, J. C. (2023). Análisis de la efectividad del Currículo Ecuatoriano en inglés como Segunda Lengua para estudiantes con dificultades de aprendizaje. MQRInvestigar, 7(4), 3085–3112. https://doi.org/10.56048/MQR20225.7.4.2023.3085-3112
Villabona, N., & Cenoz, J. (2022). The integration of content and language in CLIL: a challenge for content-driven and language-driven teachers. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 35(1), 36-50. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2021.1910703
Derechos de autor 2024 Lucía Tapia, Melita Vega
Esta obra está bajo licencia internacional Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObrasDerivadas 4.0.