Study on the Relationship Between Personality and Knowledge Sharing Behavior Based on Moderating Knowledge Governance Situation

  • Wang Xiaoyan School of Economic & Management of Northwest University - China
  • An Liren School of Economic & Management of Northwest University - China
  • Nosheena Yasir School of Economic & Management of Northwest University - China
Keywords: Personality Traits; Knowledge Governance Situation; Knowledge Sharing Behavior; HLM

Abstract

In an organization, people’s knowledge sharing behavior is not only related to their personality traits but also regulated by the knowledge governance situation of their organizations. This paper demonstrates the intrinsic relationship between the big five personalities, the knowledge sharing the behaviour of the organization and the situation of knowledge governance, establishes a construct model of the big five personalities as the independent variable, the knowledge sharing behavior as the dependent variable and the knowledge governance situation as the moderator variable. The questionnaire was used to collect the scale data and the HLM model was used to test the relevant hypotheses. The results show that different personality traits have different correlations with knowledge sharing behavior, and knowledge governance situation has a moderating effect on the relationship between personality traits and knowledge sharing behavior.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biography

Nosheena Yasir, School of Economic & Management of Northwest University - China

Corresponding author. School of Economic & Management of Northwest University, Xi’an 710127 China

References

[1] Costa, McCrae. Normal personality assessment in clinical practice: the NEO personality inventory [J].Psychological Assessment, 1992,4(1): 5-13
[2] Peabody, D. and Goldberg, L. Some determinants of factor structures from personality-trait descriptions [J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1989, 57(3): 552-567
[3] Gupta, B. Role of personality in knowledge sharing and knowledge acquisition behavior[J].Journal of the Indian Academy of Applied Psychology,2008,34(1):143-149
[4] Clark, L.A. and Watson, D. (1991), “General affective dispositions in physical and psychological health”, in Snyder, C.R., Forsyth, D.R.(Eds), Handbook of Social and Clinical Psychology: The Health Perspective, Pergamum, New York, NY
[5] Cabrera, A., Collins, W. Salgado, J. Determinants of individual engagement in knowledge sharing [J].International Journal of Human Resource Management,2006, 17(2): 245-264
[6] Barrick, M.R., Mount, M.K, Piotrowski, M. Personality and job performance: test of the mediating effects of motivation among sales representatives[J].Journal of Applied Psychology, 2002, 87(1): 43-51
[7] Rothmann, S., Coetzer, E.P. The big five personality dimensions and job performance [J].SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 2003,29(1): 68-74
[8] Witt, L., Barrick, M., Burke, Mount, M. The interactive effects of conscientiousness and agreeableness on job performance [J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2002,87(1): 164-169
[9] Matzler, K., Renzl, B., Mooradian, T, Von Krogh, G. ,Mülleret, J. Personality traits, affective commitment, documentation of knowledge, and knowledge sharing [J]. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 2011,22(2): 296-310
[10] Raducanu, R.R. (2012), “Assessment of employees’ attitudes and intentions to share knowledge based on their individual characteristics”, Unpublished Master’s Dissertation Submitted to the Department of Strategic Management and Globalization, Copenhagen Business School, Copenhagen
[11] Barrick.Mount. The big five personality dimensions and job performance: a meta-analysis[J]. Personnel Psychology, 1991,44(1): 1-26
[12] Grandori A. Governance structures, coordination mechanisms and cognitive models [J]. Journal of Management and Governance,1997,1:29-47
[13] Peltokorpi V, Tsuyuki E. Knowledge governance in a Japanese project-based organization [J].Knowledge Management Research and Practice,2006,4:36-45
[14] Foss N J,Husted K,Michailova S, Pedersen T. Governing knowledge processes: The orentical foundations and research opportunities. CKG Working Paper, No.l /2003. Center for Knowledge Governance ,Copenhagen Business School, 2003
[21] Amayah, A.T. (2011), “Knowledge sharing, personality traits and diversity: a literature review”, presented at the Midwest Research-to Practice Conference in Adult, Continuing, and Community Education, 21-23 September, Linden wood University, St. Louis, MO.79
[22] Ardichvili, A. Learning and knowledge sharing in virtual communities of practice: motivators, barriers, and enablers [J]. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 2008,10(4): 541-554
[23] McCrae, R.R. Human nature and culture: a trait perspective [J]. Journal of Research in Personality,2004, 38(1): 3-14
[24] Borges, R. Tacit knowledge sharing between IT workers: the role of organizational culture, personality, and social environment [J]. Management Research Review, 2013,36(1):73-84
[25] Amayah, A.T. (2011), “Knowledge sharing, personality traits and diversity: a literature review”, presented at the Midwest Research-to Practice Conference in Adult, Continuing, and Community Education, 21-23 September, Linden wood University, St. Louis, MO.79
[26] Wang, S., Noe, R.A. and Wang, Z.M. Motivating knowledge sharing in knowledge management systems: a quasi–field experiment [J]. Journal of Management,2011, 37(4): 10-17
[27] John 0 P, Donahue E M, Kentle R L. The big five inventory versions 4a and 54 [M]. CA: University of California, Berkeley, Institute of Personality and Social Research, 1991,61-76
[28] Davenport, T.H. Prusak, L. Working knowledge: how organizations manage what they know[M]. Boston: Harvard Business school press. 1998
[29] Meng Hsiang Hsu, Teresa L. Ju, Chia-Hui Yen, Chun-Ming Chang. Knowledge sharing behavior in virtual communities: The relationship between trust, self-efficacy, and outcome expectations [J]. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies,2007,65(6):121-139
[30] Foss N J, Husted K, Michailova S. Governing knowledge sharing in organizations: Levels of analysis governance mechanisms and research directions [J]. Journal of Management Studies,2010,47(3):455-482
[31] Benn Lawson, Kenneth J. Petersen, Paul D. Cousins, and Robert B. Hadfield. Knowledge Sharing in Interorganizational Product Development Teams: The Effect of Formal and Informal Socialization Mechanisms [J].Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2009,26:156-172
[33] Saurykova, Z. M., Ybyraimzhanov, K., & Mailybaeva, G. (2018). Implementation of interdisciplinary relationships in education on the basis of science integration. Opción, 34(85-2), 353-385
[34] Selomo, M. R., & Govender, K. K. (2016). Procurement and Supply Chain Management in Government Institutions: A Case Study of Select Departments in the Limpopo Province, South Africa. Dutch Journal of Finance and Management, 1(1), 37. https://doi.org/10.20897/lectito.201637
[35] Bakhshandeh, M., Sedrposhan, N., & Zarei, H. (2015). The Effectiveness of Cognitive-Behavioral Group Counseling to Reduce Anxiety, Marriage; Single People have to be Married in Esfahan City (2013-2014). UCT Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities Research, 3(1), 10-13
[36] Piteira, M., Costa, C. J., & Aparicio, M. (2018). Computer Programming Learning: How to Apply Gamification on Online Courses?. Journal of Information Systems Engineering & Management, 3(2), 11.
[37] Sulistyaningsih, D., Purnomo, & Aziz, A. (2019). Development of Learning Design for Mathematics Manipulatives Learning based on E-learning and Character Building. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 14(1), 197-205. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/3996
Published
2019-07-29
How to Cite
Xiaoyan, W., Liren, A., & Yasir, N. (2019). Study on the Relationship Between Personality and Knowledge Sharing Behavior Based on Moderating Knowledge Governance Situation . Religación, 4(17), 19-30. Retrieved from https://revista.religacion.com/index.php/religacion/article/view/353