Measuring Psychometric Properties of the Effective Teaching Elements for Trust School Program (TSP)

  • Jemahliah Mohamed Salleh Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia - MALAYSIA
  • Mohd Effendi Ewan Mohd Matore Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia – MALAYSIA
Keywords: effective teaching instruments, Trust School Program (TSP), Rasch Model, validity, reliability.

Abstract

Student-centred learning in the School Trust Program (TSP) provides a benchmark and reference centre for 21st century learning. Unfortunately, research on the psychometric properties of items for testing TSP elements is very limited. It is difficult to obtained empirical evidence for accurate, valid, and reliable measurement items. Therefore, this study aimed to test the psychometric properties of the items for TSP teaching elements through the Rasch Model. The study utilized a survey design with a fully quantitative approach. The questionnaire was adapted from the Trust School Teacher Handbook 2018, Performance Management System for Teachers.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biographies

Jemahliah Mohamed Salleh, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia - MALAYSIA

Faculty of Education, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 43600 Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia.

 

Mohd Effendi Ewan Mohd Matore, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia – MALAYSIA

Corresponding author. Center of Teaching and Learning Innovation, Faculty of Education, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 43600 Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia

References

Asmawati Suhid, Mohd Rezduan Mat Jurit & Fathiyah Mohd Fakhruddin. 2014. Personaliti Pendidik Yang Ideal: Apa Kata Pelajar di Institut Pengajian Tinggi? Journal of al-Quran and Tarbiyyah 1(1): 1–8.

Balsamo, M., Giampaglia, G. & Saggino, A. 2014. Building a new Rasch-based self-report inventory of depression. Neuropsychitric Disease and Treatment 10: 153–165.

Bejar, I.I. 1983. Subject Matter Experts’ Assessment of Item Statistics. Applied Psychological Measurement 7(3): 303–310.

Bond, T.G. & Fox, C.M. 2015a. Applying The Rasch Model: Fundamental Measurement in the Human sciences. Third Edition. New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.

Bond, T.G. & Fox, C.M. 2015b. Applying The Rasch model. Third Edit. New York: Routledge New York.

Boone, W.J., Staver, J.R. & Melissa, S.Y. 2014. Rasch Analysis in the Human Sciences. Dordrecht: Springer.

Fisher, J.W.P. 2007. Rating scale instrument quality criteria. Rasch MeasurementTransactions 21(1): 1095.

Jones J. A & Fox C. M. 1998. Uses of Rasch modelling in counselling psychology research. Journal of Counselling psychology 45(1): 30–45.

Karim, E. & Osman, K. 2019. Kesahan dan Kebolehpercayaan ujian kemahiran proses sains untuk murid sekolah rendah berdasarkan Model Pengukuran Rasch. Jurnal Pendidikan Malaysia 1(2018): 1–9.

Khan, A., Chien, C.-W. & Brauer, S.G. 2013. Rasch-based scoring offered more precision in differentiating patient groups in measuring upper limb function. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 66(6): 681–687.

Lans, R.M. Van Der, Grift, W.J.C.M. Van De & Veen, K. Van. 2017. Developing an Instrument for Teacher Feedback : Using the Rasch Model to Explore Teachers ’ Development of Effective Teaching Strategies and Behaviors. The Journal of Experimental Education): 1–18.

Linacre, J. 2002. Optimizing rating scale category effectiveness. Journal of Applied Measurement 3(1): 85–106.

Linacre, J. 2005a. Test validity, and rasch Measurement: Construct, Content,etc.Rasch Measurement Transactions. Chicago,Illinois: Mesa Press.

Linacre, J. 2005b. A user’s guide to WINSTEPS: Rasch Model Computer Programs. Chicago: MESA Press.

Linacre, J. 2012. A user’s guide to WINSTEPS: Monistep Rasch Model Computer Programs. MESA Press.

Maulana, R., Helms-lorenz M. & Grift, W. Van De. 2017. Validating a model of effective teaching behaviour of pre-service teachers. Teachers and Teaching 23(4):471-493 2017.

Martyn Denscombe. 2017. The Good Research Guide : For Small Scale Social Reseach Projects. 6th Editio. Leicester: Open University Press.

Mu’min & Hassan, A. 2018. Analisis validitas instrumen kompetensi dan prestasisekolah di SMP Negeri 20 Kota Batam dengan Rasch Model. Khazanah Ilmu Berazam 1: 1–13.

Sakarneh, M. 2015. Articulation of Quality Teaching: A Comparative Study. Journal of Education and Training Studies 3(1): 7–20.

Schumacher, G., Grigsby, B. & Vesey, W. 2015. Determining Effective Teaching Behaviors Through The Hiring Process. International Journal Of Education Management 29(1): 139–155.

Siti Rahayah Ariffin. 2008. Inovasi Dalam pengukuran dan penilaian Pendidikan. Bangi: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.

Sumintono, B. & Widhiarso., W. 2015. Aplikasi Pemodelan Rasch pada Assessment Pendidikan. Cimahi: Trim Komunikata Publishing House.

Sumintono, B. & Widhiarso, W. 2014. Aplikasi Model Rasch : Untuk Penelitian Ilmu-ilmu sosial. Cimahi: Trim Komunikata Publishing House.

Yayasan Amir dan LeapEd Services. 2016. Garis Panduan sekolah Amanah(GPSA). Edisi Pert. Kuala Lumpur: Unit Sekolah Amanah, Bahagian Pengurusan Sekolah Harian(BPSH), Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia(KPM).

Published
2019-10-30
How to Cite
Salleh, J. M., & Ewan Mohd Matore, M. E. (2019). Measuring Psychometric Properties of the Effective Teaching Elements for Trust School Program (TSP). Religación, 4(20), 64-69. Retrieved from https://revista.religacion.com/index.php/religacion/article/view/472