Political Institute of the State in the context of the historical and typological analysis

  • Valentin Ya. Lyubashits Southern Federal University - Russia
  • Nikolay V. Razuvaev Russian Academy of National Economy and Public Service - Russia
  • Irina E. Abramova Rostov State Medical University - Russia
  • Natalya V. Fedorova Don State Technical University - Russia
  • Y. S. Benedyk Yaroslav Mudry National Law University - Ukraine
Keywords: historical, typological analysis, potestarny structures, historicism, Kondratiyev’s paradigm.

Abstract

The article is devoted to problems of structuring state created history taking into account a variety of social, political, forms, various speeds of political genesis. Problems of allocation of development stages of the political organizations (statehood) taking into account uncertainty of the general units of the analysis, terms, and concepts of rather various paradigms of structuring and periodization of history are considered. It is shown that the decisive force causing the transformation of all other public sectors is growth, distribution, and deduction of a dominant position of the most effective in the conditions of this period of a political regime.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biographies

Valentin Ya. Lyubashits, Southern Federal University - Russia

Corresponding author.  Doctor of jurisprudence, professor, Head of the department of the theory and history of state and law, Southern Federal University

Nikolay V. Razuvaev, Russian Academy of National Economy and Public Service - Russia

Doctor of jurisprudence, associate professor, head of the department of the civil and labor law, Northwest institute of management of the Russian academy of national economy and public service

Irina E. Abramova, Rostov State Medical University - Russia

Doctor of political sciences, professor, Manager of department of History Rostov state medical university

Natalya V. Fedorova, Don State Technical University - Russia

Сandidate of historical sciences, associate professor, Don State Technical University

Y. S. Benedyk, Yaroslav Mudry National Law University - Ukraine

PhD, Assistant of the Department of International Law, Yaroslav Mudry National Law University, Kharkiv, Ukraine

References

Adriana, J., & Holanda, M. (2016). Brasilia’s Database Administrators. Journal of Information Systems Engineering & Management, 1(3), 149-157. https://doi.org/10.20897/lectito.201630

Ali, Y., Nusair, M. M., Alani, F., Khan, F. R., & Al Badi, L. (2017). Employment in the Private Sector in Oman: Sector-Based Approach for Localization. Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews, eISSN, 2395-6518.

Bytyak, Y. P., Yakovyuk, I. V., Tragniuk, O., Komarova, T. V., & Shestopal, S. S. (2017). The State Sovereignty and Sovereign Rights: Correlation Problem. Man in India, 97(23), 577-588.

Chase-Dunn K., Hall T., (2001). One, two, many world systems. World Time. Issue 2. Novosibirsk.

Claessen, H.J.M., Oosten, J.G. (1996). Ideology and the formation of early states. Leiden.

Claessen, HJ.M., Velde, P. van de. Smith, M.E. (1985). Development and decline; The evolution of sociopolitical organization. South Hadley (MA).

Goudsblom, J. (1996). Human History and Long-Term Social Processes: Toward a Synthesis of Chronology and Phaseology. Goudsblom J., Jones E.L, Mennell S.The Course of Human History. Economic Growth, Social Process and Civilization. M.E. Sharpe, N.Y.; L., P.20.

Ilyin, M. V., (1999). Choice of Russia: myth, destiny, culture. Via Regia. No. 1-2.

Lyubashits, V. Y. (1993). General theory of the state. P.1. Origin, essence and nature of the state. Rostov-on-Don,

Lyubashits, V., (2017). Sociocultural measurement of institutional and functional characteristics of public-power interactions//Lyubashits V., Mamychev A., Uvarova G., Artyukhin O. Man in India. T. 97. No. 23. Page 461-470.

Lyubashits, V.Y., Mamychev, A.Y., Shalyapin, S.O., Filippova, M.K. (2016). Prognostic problems of the public and power organization of the Russian society: Archetypes and sociocultural basis of functioning and development. International Review of Management and Marketing 6 (6). P.85-89.

Mamychev, A. Yu., Kachurova, S.V., Shestopal, S.S. (2016). Socio-cultural (archetypal) basis of transformation of public power organizations: forms and directions. Baltic Humanitarian Journal, T5, No. 4 (17), 375-380.

Martyshin, O. V. (2003). History of political and legal doctrines / Under the editorship of O. V. Martyshin. M.

Marx, K., Engels, F. (1981). Compositions. M, 1955-1981. T.13.

Mordovtsev, A. Yu., Mamychev, A. Yu., Shestopal, S.S. (2017). Russian statehood as a particular civilizational and legal mentality type. Baltic Humanitarian Journal. 2017. T. 6. No. 4(21)

Mordovtsev, A., Zhinkin, S., Mamychev, A., Yakovyuk, I., Shestopal, S. (2017). Legal Mentality in National Cultural Space: Characteristics of the ERA of Change (Church Schism of the 17th Century). Man in India, 97(23), 295-309.

Mordovtsev, A.Y., Mamychev A. Yu., Shestopal S.S., (2017). Essential content of Russian legal mentality. Azimuth of Scientific Research: Economics and Administration. 2017. T. 6. No. 4(21)

Pashinsky, V. M., (1994). Recurrence in the history of Russia (a look from a position of social ecology) The Policy. No. 4.

Popper, K. (1993). Poverty of history science. M.

Room van, C., (1984). Historians and Long Waves. Long Waves in the World Economy. L., R.237-244.

Rozov, N. S., (1992). Structure of civilizations and tendencies of world development. Novosibirsk.

Rozov, N. S., (1995). Possibility of theoretical history: answer to Karl Popper’s call. Philosophy Questions. 1995. No. 12. Page 55-69;

Rozov, N. S., (1999). Structure of social ontology: on the way to synthesis of macrohistorical paradigms. Questions of philosophy. 1999. No. 2. Page 3-22;

Rozov, N. S., (2001). Development and approbation of a method of theoretical history. Scientific editor N. S. Rozov. Novosibirsk, 2001; etc.

Rozov, N. S., (2001). On the way to reasonable periodization of world history. Structures of history//world Time. Issue 2. Novosibirsk, 2001. Page 247.

Umov, V. I., Lapkin V. V. (1992). Kondratyevsky cycles and Russia: forecast of reforms. Policy. No. 4.

Published
2019-10-30
How to Cite
Lyubashits, V. Y., Razuvaev, N. V., Abramova, I. E., Fedorova, N. V., & Benedyk, Y. S. (2019). Political Institute of the State in the context of the historical and typological analysis. Religación, 4(20), 114-120. Retrieved from https://revista.religacion.com/index.php/religacion/article/view/482