The Influence of Formal Authority and Delegator Teaching Style on Students’ Enjoyment In The Business Studies Subject
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to examine the teacher’s teaching style and students’ attitude towards the business studies subject. The samples were 189 upper six students who took business studies subject. This study used the survey method. Descriptive and inferential statistics used were Pearson correlations. The study found that the personal model teaching style was the preferred teaching style. Students’ attitude towards the business studies subject was at a moderate level. Correlation analysis revealed a significant positive relationship between teachers’ teaching style and students’ attitude toward business studies subject. The results of Pearson’s correlation test found that two types of teaching styles that were formal authority and delegator style had a significant relationship with the sub-constructs of attitude namely enjoyment.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Abd. Majid Mohd Isa. 2002. Pemikiran dalam pendidikan. Kota Kinabalu : Universiti Malaysia Sabah.
Abd. Rahim Abd. Rashid. 2005. Profesionalisme Keguruan: Prospek dan Cabaran. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.
Donald L.B, Marjorie M.G & Conrad E.A. t.th. Improving Student Attitudes Toward Careers In Small Business. http://www.sbaer.uca.edu/research/sbida/1985/PDF/39.pdf
Dressel, P.L. and Marcus, D. 1982. Education as a humanizing experience. In P.L. Dressel and D. Marcus (Eds) On teaching and learning in college: Reemphasizing the roles of learners and the disciplines, hlm. 32-65. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Felder, R.M & Henriques, E.R. 1995. Learning and teaching styles in foreign and second language education. Foreign Language Annals. 28 (1): 21-31
Ford, N & Chen, S.Y. 2001. Matching/mismatching revisited: An empirical study of learning and teaching styles. British Journal of Educational Technolog. 32(1): 5-22.
Gogolin, L. & Swartz, F. 1992. A quantitative and qualitative inquiry into the attitude toward science of non science college students. Journal of Research In Science Theaching 29 (5) : 487-504.
Grasha, A.F. 1996. Teaching with style. A practical guide to enhance learning by understanding learning and teaching style. New York: Alliance Publisher.
Hersey, P., Blanchard, K.H & Caracushansky,s. 1992. Variations in the teaching style on course outcomes. Management of organizational behavior. Utilizing human resources. Eaglewood Cliff, N. Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Hyland, K. 1993. Culture and learning: A study of the learning styles preferences of Japanese students. RELC Journal. 24 (2): 69-91
John A.S, Todd A.B, Levente L,Alberta C.S & Brennen B. 2008. Attitude and Divergence in Business Students:An Examination of Personality Differences in Business and Non-Business Students. Electronic Journal of Business Ethics and Organization Studies 13 (2): 70-78.
John L. 1996. Faculty Manual. A Guide for Bible School Teaching http://www.apeo.org/schools/Faculty%20Manual.Pdf
Majlis Peperiksaan Malaysia. 1998. Pengajian Perniagaan : Sukatan Pelajaran Dan Soalan Contoh. Selangor Darul Ehsan: Percetakan Warni Sdn. Bhd.
Majlis Peperiksaan Malaysia. 2013 – 2017. Laporan tahunan. Selangor: Affluent Master.
Nasir Kirino. 2006. Hubungan antara Gaya Pengajaran Guru dengan Sikap Pelajar terhadap Mata Pelajaran Sejarah. Projek Penyelidikan Sarjana. Fakulti Pendidikan. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.
Nor Aishah Buang & Affzalina Hassan. 2017. Perbandingan Tahap Sikap, Pemikiran Dan Tingkah Laku Keusahawanan Dengan Tahap Perancangan Berniaga Mahasiswa Jurusan Sains. Journal of Global Business and Social Entrepreneurship (GBSE): 86–99.
Nor Aishah Buang. 1998. Tujahan pendidikan teknik dan vokasional keusahawanan. A Workshop Report on Research Focus of the National Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, pages 26-31.
Nor Aishah Buang. 2013. Pendidikan Keusahawanan. Publisher: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.
Nor Aishah Buang. 2018. Cabaran Membangun Usahawan Siswazah. Publisher: Dewan Bahasa dan. Pustaka, Kuala Lumpur.
Norhatta Mohd. 2003. Pengetahuan, kemahiran dan sikap dalam perniagaan dan keusahawanan dikalangan pelajar-pelajar sekolah menengah di sekitar Lembah Klang. Unpublished Masters Thesis. Fakulti Pendidikan. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.
Noriah Mohd Ishak, Nor Sakinah Mohamed, Noor Kefli Mohd. Sulong, Prof. Madya Datin Dr. Amla Mohd. Salleh. 1999. Gaya Pertautan, Gaya Pengajaran dan Komitmen terhadap Profesyen Perguruan Di Kalangan Guru-Guru Pelatih UKM. Laporan Projek G/4/99. Bangi: UKM.
Peacock, M. 2000. Learning style and teaching style preferences in EFL. Hong Kong Journals Online. 12 : 88-114. http://www.sunzi1.lib.hku.hk/hkjo/view/10/1000206.pdf
Richardson, T.R & Tring, J.P. 1997. Student characteristics and learning or grade orientation influence preferred teaching style. College Teaching Journal 31(3): 347-350
Roslind Anak Mawing. 2003. Hubungan antara Gaya Pengajaran Guru dengan Sikap Pelajar terhadap Bahasa Melayu. Projek Penyelidikan Sarjana. Fakulti Pendidikan. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.
Siti Zubaidah Bte Mohamed Said. 2006. Gaya pengajaran guru yang disukai dengan sikap pelajar terhadap mata pelajaran biologi. Projek Penyelidikan Sarjana. Fakulti Pendidikan. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.
Tudor, Ian. 1996. Learner-centeredness as language education. New York : Cambridge University Press.
Woods, D. R. 1994. Problem-based learning: How to gain the most from PBL. 2nd ed. Ontario Canada: Waterdown.
