Role of Project Management Maturity: Substantial Interest to Assess and Improve Development of Viable Methods
Abstract
To improve and assess the project management maturity in the development of viable methods the community of project management is actively demonstrating substantial interest. To provide several organizations among industries a means to benchmark that their maturity relative to others for assessing project management maturity the interest also underscores the important need. This paper studied to improve and access the method for project management maturity. We studied the concept of project management maturity, its different levels and models.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Crawford JK (2006) The Project Management Maturity Model. Information Systems Management, 23 (4): 50-58.
Donaldson L (2001) The Contingency Theory of Organizations, Thousand Oaks, London, New Delhi, Sage.
Dooley, K., Subra, A. & Anderson, J. (2001), Maturity and Its Impact on New Product Development Project Performance, Research in Engineering Design, 13 (1), 23–29.
Filippini, R. (1997), Operations Management Research: Some Reflections on Evolution, Models and Empirical Studies in OM, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 17 (7).
Grant, Kevin & Pennypacker, James. (2006). Project management maturity: An assessment of project management capabilities among and between selected industries. Engineering Management, IEEE Transactions on. 53. 59 - 68. 10.1109/TEM.2005.861802.
Hutchinson, A. & Finnemore, M. (1999), Standardized Process Improvement for Construction Enterprises, Total Quality Management, 10 (4-5), 576–583.
Jugdev, K. & Mathur, G. (2012), Classifying Project Management Resources by Complexity and Leverage, International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 5 (1), 105–124.
Koskela L, Howell G (2008) The Underlying Theory of Project Management Is Obsolete. Engineering Management Review, 36 (2): 22-34.
Marshall S (2010) A Quality Framework for Continuous Improvement of e-Learning: The eLearning Maturity Model. The journal of distance education, 24 (1): 143 – 166.
Milosevic D, Srivannaboon S (2006) A two-way influence between business strategy and project management. International Journal of Project Management, 24: 493-505.
Malhotra, M.K. & Grover, V. (1998), An Assessment of Survey Research in POM: From Constructs to Theory, Journal of Operations Management, 16 (4), 407– 425.
Maseleno, A., Huda, M., Jasmi, K. A., Basiron, B., Mustari, I., Don, A. G., & bin Ahmad, R. (2019). Hau-Kashyap approach for student’s level of expertise. Egyptian Informatics Journal, 20(1), 27-32.
Maseleno, A., Hardaker, G., Sabani, N., & Suhaili, N. (2016). Data on multicultural education and diagnostic information profiling: Culture, learning styles and creativity. Data in brief, 9, 1048.
Maseleno, A., Huda, M., Siregar, M., Ahmad, R., Hehsan, A., Haron, Z., ... & Jasmi, K. A. (2017). Combining the previous measure of evidence to educational entrance examination. Journal of Artificial Intelligence, 10(3), 85-90.
Pennypacker, J. S. & Grant, K. P. (2002). Project management maturity: an industry-wide assessment. Paper presented at PMI® Research Conference 2002: Frontiers of Project Management Research and Applications, Seattle, Washington. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute.
Rao R (2005) Implementing OPM3®-The challenges and next steps, in Implementing organizational project management maturity model PMI Global Congress 2005--North America. Proceedings.
Rezaeean, A. & Falaki, P. (2012), Agile Project Management, International Research Journal of Applied and Basic Sciences, 3 (4), 698–707.
Sarshar, M., Haigh, R., Finnemore, M., Aouad, G., Barrett, P., Baldry, D. & Sexton, M. (2000), SPICE: a Business Process Diagnostics Tool for Construction Projects, Engineering Construction and Architectural Management, 7 (3), 241–250.
