Positioning in the face of mandatory confinements and social control during the pandemic in Chile: an analysis based on emotional profiles
Abstract
The control of the pandemic generated by COVID-19 rely, to a large extent, on the disposition that people have or not to comply with the measures ordered by the health authority. In this study, the degrees of rejection and assimilation that different groups of people maintain regarding two types of measures designed to control the pandemic are analyzed: mandatory confinement and modification of daily routines. To do this, the emotions of a sample of 1911 people were evaluated using a questionnaire with Likert response options, an instrument constructed and validated for this research. The results allowed the identification of six emotional profiles with different sociodemographic conditions. In a pole, characterized by experiences of anger, sadness, and distrust in the face of the measures, there is a profile made up of young women, students and with a low level of economic income. At the other pole, characterized by presenting a state of comfort in the face of the pandemic and confidence in the proposed measures, there is a group made up of men, aged between 40 and 69 years, with a high educational level and high economic income. In between, we find four more profiles, with different emotional characteristics and sociodemographic conditions. The results are discussed considering their contribution to the design of non- “homogenizing” public policies for the control of the pandemic.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Aiken, L. (1985). Three Coefficients for Analyzing the Reliability and Validity of Ratings. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45(1), 131–42. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0013164485451012
Albarracín, D., Johnson, B. T., & Zanna, M. P. (2005). The Hanbook of Attitudes. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
Apaza, C., Seminario, R., & Santa-Cruz, J. (2020). Factores psicosociales durante el confinamiento por el Covid-19 – Perú. Revista Venezolana de Gerencia, 25(90), 402-413. https://doi.org/10.37960/rvg.v25i90.32385
Bächler, R. (2019). Del problema emoción-cognición a la integración de la fenomenología y la intencionalidad de los estados mentales. En P. López-Silva, Discusiones contemporáneas en Filosofía de la mente. Voces locales (pp.. 123-150). Instituto de Filosofía, Universidad de Valparaíso.
Barbalet, J. (1996). Social emotions: Confidence, trust and loyalty. International journal of sociology and social policy, 16(9/10), 7596. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb013270
Barrett, L. (2018). La vida secreta de cerebro. Como se construyen las emociones. Paidós.
Brooks, S., Webster, R., Smith, L., Woodland, L., Wessely, S., Greenberg, N., & James, G. R. (2020). The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: rapid review of the evidence. Lancet, 395(10227). 912–920. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30460-8
Centro Nacional de Información en Ciencias Médicas. (2020). Coronavirus 2019 actualización. Centro Nacional de Información de Ciencias Médicas/INFOMED. https://temas.sld.cu/coronavirus/2019-ncov/actualización17defebrerode2020
Charland, L. C. (2005). The Heat of Emotion: Valence and the demarcation problem. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 12(8), 82-102.
Choliz, M. (2005). Psicología de la emoción: el proceso emocional. Página de Mariano Chóliz Montañés. www.uv.es/=choliz
Clore, G. L. (2005). The influence of affect on attitude. In D. Albarracín, B. T. Johnson, & M. P. Zanna, The hanbook of attitudes (pp. 437-489). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
Coates, A., Castro, A., Marmot, M., Mujica, O., Eijkemans, G., & Victora, C. (2020). Just societies: A new vision for health equity in the Americas after COVID-19. Revista Panamena Salud Pública, 44, 1-4. https://doi.org/10.26633/RPSP.2020.137
Comisión Interamericana de Mujeres. (2020). COVID-19 en la vida de las mujeres: Razones para reconocer los impactos diferenciados. Secretaría General de la Organización de los Estados Americanos (SG/OEA). https://www.oas.org/es/cim/docs/ArgumentarioCOVID19-ES.pdf
Cuiyan, P. R., Wan, X., Tan, Y., Xu, L., Ho, C. S., & Ho, R. C. (2020). Immediate psychological responses and associated factors during the initial stage of the 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) epidemic among the general population in China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(5), 1729. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17051729
Damasio, A. (2009). En busca de Spinoza. Neurobiología de la emoción. Crítica.
De Jaegher, H. (2019). Loving and knowing: reflections for an engaged epistemology. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 20, 847–870 http://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-019-09634-5
De Sousa, R. (1987). The Rationality of Emotion. MIT Press.
Domínguez, A., Aguilera, S., Acosta, T., Navarro, G., & Ruiz, Z. (2012). La deseabilidad social revalorada: más que una distorsión, una necesidad de aprobación social. Acta de investigación Psicológica, 2, 808-824.
Emerson, K. (2020). Coping with being cooped up: Social distancing during COVID-19 among 60+ in the United States. Revista Panameña de Salud pública, 44, 1-7.
Fernández González , L., & Bravo Valenzuela, P. (2020). Expertos y redes sociales: ¿Cómo comunicarnos en tiempos de pandemia? Revista médica de Chile, 148(4), 560-561. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/s0034-98872020000400560
Gómez, R. (2012). Gestión de políticas públicas: aspectos operativos. Revista Facultad Nacional Salud Pública, 30(2), 223-236.
Guenther, L. (2013). Solitary Confinement: Social Death and Its Afterlives. Minnesota University Press
Hawryluck, L., Gold, W. L., Robinson, S., Pogorski, S., Galea, S., & Styra, R. (2004). SARS control and psychological effects of quarantine, Toronto, Canada. Emerging infectious diseases, 10(7), 1206-1212. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid1007.030703
Jímenez, Á., Duarte, F., & Rojas, G. (2020, junio 20). Sindemia, la triple crisis social, sanitaria y económica; y su efecto en la salud mental. Ciper académico. https://cutt.ly/WYXATDs
Johnson, R., Onwuegbuzie, A., & Turner, L. (2007). Toward a definition of mixed Methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods research, 1(2), 112-133. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1558689806298224
Johnsonn, M., Saletti-Cuesta, L., & Tumas, N. (2020). Emociones, preocupaciones y reflexiones frente a la pandemia del COVID-19. Ciência & Saude Coletiva, 25(1), 2447-2456. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232020256.1.10472020
Leiva, A. M., Nazar, G., Martinez-Sangüinetti, M. A., Petermannn-Rocha, F., Richezza, J., & Celis-Morales, C. (2020). Dimensión psicosocial de la pandemia: la otra cara del Covid-19. Ciencia y enfermería, 26(10). http://dx.doi.org/10.29393/ce26-3dpal60003
Mazza, C., Ricci, E., Biondi, S. C., Ferracuti, S., Napoli, C., & Roma, P. (2020). A Nationwide Survey of Psychological Distress among Italian People during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Immediate Psychological Responses and Associated Factors. Environmental research and public health, 17(9), 3165. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17093165
Nussbaum, M. (2008). Paisajes del pensamiento. La Inteligencia de las emociones. Barcelona: Paidós.
OMS. (2020). Preventing and Managing Covid19 Across Long-Term Care Services. Organización Mundial de la Salud.
Ortega, M. (2020). COVID-19: la nueva enfermedad X. Sanidad Militar, 76(1), 5-7. http://doi.org/10.4321/s1887-85712020000100001
Ortony, A., & Clore, G. (2015). Can an Apraisal Model Be Compatible with Psychological Constructonism? En L. Feldman Barrett, & J. A. Rusell, The psychological constrution of emotion (pp. 305-333). Guilford Press.
Podestá Arzubiaga, J. (2001). Problematización de las políticas públicas desde la óptica regional. 9(15), 163-175. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-22362001000200007
Ponce de León, L. (2020). Reflexiones sobre COVID-19 y población vulnerable: ¿Estado de Bienestar o Neoliberalismo? Ehquidad. International Welfare Policies and Social Work Journal, 14, 13-36. https://doi.org/10.15257/ehquidad.2020.0010
Pozo, J. I., Scheuer, N., Pérez Echeverría, M. d., Mateos, M., Martín, E., & de la Cruz, M. (2006). Nuevas Formas de Pensar la Enseñanza y el Aprendizaje. Las concepciones de Profesores y Alumnos. Barcelona: GRAÓ.
Rousseau, D. M., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R. S., & Camerer, C. (1998). Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 393–404.
Salari, N., Hosseinian-Far, A., Jalali, R., Vaisi-Raygani, Rasoulpoor, S., Mohammadi, M., Rasoulpoor, S., & Khaledi-Paveh, B. (2020). Prevalence of stress, anxiety, depression among the general population during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Global Health, 57(16). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-020-00589-w
Sandín, B., & Chorot, P. (2017). Cuestionario de Sucesos Vitales (CSV). Revista de Psicopatología y Psicología, 22, 95-115. https://doi.org/10.5944/rppc.vol.22.num.2.2017.19729
Sandín, B., Valiente, R., García-Escalera, J., & Chorot, P. (2020). Impacto psicológico de la pandemia de COVID-19: Efectos negativos y positivos en población española asociados al periodo de confinamiento nacional. Revista de Psicopatología y Psicología, 25(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.5944/rppc.27569
Santos Padrón, H. (2011). Los determinantes sociales, las desigualdades en salud y las políticas, como temas de investigación. Revista Cubana de Salud Pública, 37(2). http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_artt
Solomon, R. (2007). Etica emocional: una teoría de los sentimientos. Paidos.
Taylor, M., Agh, K., Stevens, G., & Raphael, B. (2008). Factors influencing psychological distress during a disease epidemic: data from Australia’s first outbreak of equine influenza. BMC Public Health, 8, 347. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-8-347
Truco, M. (2002). Estrés y trastornos mentales: aspectos neurobiologicos y psicosociales. Revista chilena de neuropsiquiatría, 40(2), 8-19. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0717-92272002000600002.
United Nations. (2020). Shared responsibility, Global solidarity: Responding to the socio-economic impacts of COVID-19. ONU. https://cutt.ly/qYXDaI8
Verdugo, L. M. (2021). Habitabilidad de la vivienda en tiempos de pandemia por Covid-19 en México. El caso de Culiacán. EHQUIDAD. Revista Internacional De Políticas De Bienestar Y Trabajo Social, 15, 77-112. https://doi.org/10.15257/ehquidad.2021.0004
World Health Organization. (2020). Pandemic fatigue – reinvigorating the public to prevent Covid-19. WHO Regional Office for Europe.
Copyright (c) 2021 Rodolfo Bachler Silva, Pablo Segovia-Lagos, Constanza Carter
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.