Presidentialism, impeachment and the decline of democratic linkage in Latin America

  • Federico Traversa Universidad de la República - Uruguay
  • Fabricio Carneiro Universidad de la República – Uruguay
Keywords: Impeachment, Presidentialism, Democracy, Latin America

Abstract

 

Impeachment processes are oversight instruments used by a democratic elected institution over another democratic elected institution. What kind of clues democratic theory gives to analyze this legitimacy clash? Impeachment processes influence democratic linkage among representative and represented as it prevents elected representatives to act and no citizen participation is required in the process. Notwithstanding whether there are constitutional well-founded causes to remove the president, impeachment processes are in tension with the democratic principle that establishes suffrage as the only mechanism for the selection of rulers, their government programs and as the main mechanism of democratic control of their administration. Moreover, impeachment processes affect democratic linkage in different ways. When these processes end in a party rotation with important programmatic switches as recently occurred in many Latin America countries, they represent a decline in programmatic mandate.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biographies

Federico Traversa, Universidad de la República - Uruguay

Doctor en Ciencia Política por la Universidad de Salamanca Profesor de la Universidad de la República, Uruguay. Investigador de la Agencia de Investigación e Innovación del Uruguay

Fabricio Carneiro, Universidad de la República – Uruguay

Estudiante de posgrado en Ciencia Política en Universidad Torcuato Di Tella. Profesor de la Universidad de la República, Uruguay.

References

Arrow, K. J. (1950). “A Difficulty in the Concept of Social Welfare”. The Journal of Political Economy, 58 (4), 328-346.

Boix, C. (1998). Political parties, growth and equality: conservative and social democratic economic strategies in the world economy. Cambridge University Press.

Dahl, R. (1971). La poliarquía. Barcelona: Ariel.

Dahl, R. A. (1992). La Democracia y sus Críticos. Barcelona: Paidós.

Downs, A. M. M., & Adolfo, L. (1973). Una Teoría Económica de la Democracia. España: Aguilar.

Linz, J. J. (1990). “The perils of presidentialism”. Journal of democracy, 1(1), 51- 69.

Przeworski, A. (1998). “Democracia y Representación”. Revista del clad Reforma y Democracia, 10, 7-32.

Riker, W. H. (1982). Liberalism Against Populism: A Confrontation Between the Theory of Democracy and the Theory of Social Choice. San Francisco: Freeman.

Schumpeter, J. A. (1984). Capitalismo, Socialismo y Democracia. Folio.

Stokes, S. (2001). Mandates and Democracy: Neoliberalism by Surprise in Latin America. Cambridge University Press.

Traversa, F. (2011). La gran transformación de la democracia: de las comunidades primitivas a la sociedad capitalista. Ediciones Universitarias.

Published
2017-09-30
How to Cite
Traversa, F., & Carneiro, F. (2017). Presidentialism, impeachment and the decline of democratic linkage in Latin America. Religación, 2(7), 48-62. Retrieved from https://revista.religacion.com/index.php/religacion/article/view/95