Procedural law and dismissal in collective labor agreements in Ecuador
Labor relations disputes often occur between workers and employers or between labor organizations and employers' organizations. The methodology used to carry out the study was a standard research method that aims to find solutions to legal problems. The approach to the problem used is statutory, conceptual approach and case approaches. The legal process is carried out by examining all laws and regulations related to the legal problem being handled. This approach is taken to find the ratio legis and the ontological basis for the birth of the law. Meanwhile, the conceptual approach is based on the visions and doctrines developed in the science of law. Finally, the research offers two concepts of procedural law on the implementation of collective agreements. First, the court may not accept a claim for disputes that have been resolved through a cooperative agreement. The Panel of Judges is enough to deliberate and only determine with a single judge that the case has been resolved and choose the order of execution.
Anggraeni, N., Koswara, I., & Gunawan, Y. (2022). Analysis of Legal Protection of Labor in the Implementation of Layoff. Legal Brief, 11(2), 379–388. https://legal.isha.or.id/index.php/legal/article/view/137
Arufe, A. (2022). La prohibición de la forma electrónica del despido en Alemania. Una norma protectora del trabajador en tiempos de digitalización del mercado de trabajo. Revista Crítica de Relaciones de Trabajo. Laborum, 2(1), 163–168. https://revista.laborum.es/index.php/revreltra/article/view/555
Bermeo, C., & Santamaría, J. (2022). El despido intempestivo y su carga probatoria. Polo Del Conocimiento, 7(1), 733–748. https://polodelconocimiento.com/ojs/index.php/es/article/view/3507
Djuraevich, A. B. (2022). Procedural Basis for the Application of Measures of Legal Influence, Their Necessity and Place in the System of Procedural Means. The American Journal of Political Science Law and Criminology, 3(1), 27–33. https://doi.org/10.37547/tajpslc/volume04issue01-05
Ferawati, S. (2021). Analysis of Notary Deed as a Basic Reference to Evidence in Civil Law. Legal brief, 10(2), 280–286.
Gombos, K. (2018). Harmonisation of procedural law vs procedural autonomy of the member state. Studia Iuridica Cassoviensia, 6(1), 24–32.
Kurniawan, D., Fauzi, A., & Ruslan. (2021). Legal Certainty on The Implementation of Electronic Registration of Liability Rights Performed by The Office of The Land Act Maker (Study at the Office of the Land Act Maker Deli Serdang). Veteran Law Review, 4(2), 120–129.
Molina, M. (2022). Ius Constitutionale Commune. Revista de derecho constitucional, 5(3), 214. https://doi.org/10.18601/01229893.n34.01
Panjaitan, H., Murniarti, E., Widyani, I Dewi, A., Pandiangan, L., Elly, A., and Siringoringo, P. (2020). Legal certainty toward advocate professional special education in Indonesia. PalArch’s Journal of Archaeology of Egypt/Egyptology, 17(4), 1638-1651. https://archives.palarch.nl/index.php/jae/article/view/1747
Satria, B. (2022). Legal certainty for health facilities in providing referral letter on patient requests in the jkn era (juridical review of the sjsn law and bpjs health law). IJERLAS International Journal of Educational Review, 2(1), 143–154. https://doi.org/10.54443/ijerlas.v2i1.160
Tamrin, I., Fahamsyah, E., & Dewi, I. (2021). Legal Certainty of the Notary Peace Act in Bankruptcy Law. Scientific Research Journal, 9(7), 10–19. https://doi.org/10.31364/scirj/v9.i07.2021.p0721868
Widi, H., & Ginting, R. (2022). Ideal Arrangements of Additional Criminal Sanctions for the Recovery of Environmental Functions for Corporations in Guarantee of Legal Certainty in Indonesia. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 4(2), 683–695. https://ijmmu.com/index.php/ijmmu/article/view/3642/3189
Copyright (c) 2022 Byron Javier Chulco-Lema, Melinton Fernando Saca-Balladares
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.