Optimization of post-election processes in Ecuador through ISO 54001, an approach to electoral efficiency
Abstract
The study examines the optimization of post-election processes in Ecuador through the implementation of ISO 54001:2019, with the purpose of improving electoral transparency and efficiency. Challenges such as cyber security, unequal access to technology and the lack of independent audits are identified, which affect citizens’ confidence in the democratic system. Through a mixed approach, polls were conducted among election officials in Esmeraldas, Tungurahua, and Pastaza, complemented by an interview with the director of the Provincial Delegation of Tungurahua. By analyzing data with SPSS and linear regression models, it was determined that the standard has a positive impact on electoral efficiency, highlighting the highest correlation in Esmeraldas and the lowest in Pastaza. The standardization of procedures allows to reduce processing times and minimize errors in data management, strengthening the credibility of the system. However, institutional resilience and insufficient technological infrastructure represent significant obstacles to its implementation. It is recommended to strengthen staff training, improve infrastructure and develop strategies to mitigate resistance to change. Comparing experiences in Mexico and Colombia, it is concluded that the adoption of international standards improves electoral management and citizen confidence. It is suggested that future studies be undertaken to assess their long-term impact.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Aguilar, D. y, & L, G. (2014). Procesos electorales y democracia: La construcción de una agenda de campaña política. Convergencia, 21(64), 143-168.
Bílek, J. (2024). Electoral manipulation and postelectoral protests in Latin America. Latin American Policy, 15(3), 362-371. https://doi.org/10.1111/lamp.12354
Bustelo Ruesta, C. (2019). Novedades en UNE ISO 30301 (2019). Sistemas de gestión para los documentos. Requisitos. Métodos de informacion, 10(19), 028-034. https://doi.org/10.5557/IIMEI10-N19-028034
Camacho Cepeda, G. (2015). Financiamiento de los procesos electorales: Examen de la Ley 19.884 sobre Transparencia, Límite y Control del Gasto Electoral. Revista de Derecho (Valdivia), 28(2), 117-144. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-09502015000200007
Cançado, A. C., & Brito, D. M. D. (2021). Digital transparency in the context of electoral justice: An analysis of the tribunal regional electoral court of Tocantins. Revista Observatório, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.20873/uft.2447-4266.2021v7n2a10en
Cárdenas Gracia, J. (2007). El proceso electoral de 2006 y las reformas electorales necesarias. Cuestiones Constitucionales Revista Mexicana de Derecho Constitucional, 1(16). https://doi.org/10.22201/iij.24484881e.2007.16.5787
Consejo Nacional Electoral. (2022). Plan estratégico institucional 2022-2025. Consejo Nacional Electoral.
Corporación Latinobarómetro. (2023). Informe Latinobarómetro 2023: La recesión democrática de América Latina. Corporación Latinobarómetro.
Curipoma, M. A. C., García, J. L., & Andrade, J. E. O. (2023). Procesos de implementación de un gestor documental: Caso de estudio unidad académica de administración. ConcienciaDigital, 6(1.3), 201-221. https://doi.org/10.33262/concienciadigital.v6i1.3.2529
Díez Garrido, M., Campos Domínguez, E., & Calvo, D. (2021). La transparencia de los partidos políticos como estrategia electoral. Una evaluación de sus promesas y sus páginas web. Tripodos, 44, 83-104. https://doi.org/10.51698/tripodos.2019.44p83-104
Dreković, E., Radosavljević, M., & Bejtović, M. (2021). Analysis of limitations of iso standards implementation from the external stakeholders’ point of view. Facta Universitatis, Series: Economics and Organization, 117. https://doi.org/10.22190/FUEO210402010D
ISO/TS 54001:2019. (s. f.). Quality management systems Particular requirements for the application of ISO 9001:2015 for electoral organizations at all levels of government. https://www.iso.org/standard/75288.html
Medina Torres, L. E., & Jaramillo, A. V. (2021). La transparencia en el Tribunal Electoral del Poder Judicial de la Federación de México: Un análisis desde los estándares del Gobierno Abierto. Revista Española de la Transparencia, 13, 71-83. https://doi.org/10.51915/ret.189
OAS. (2013, 01 de enero). OAS - Organization of American States: Democracy for peace, security, and development. https://www.oas.org/es/sap/deco/normasiso.asp
Quezada Malta, A. (2024). Norma ISO Electoral: Una oportunidad de efectividad administrativa para las autoridades electorales en México. Ius Comitiãlis, 7(13), 90. https://doi.org/10.36677/iuscomitialis.v7i13.22978
Quinteros Basantes, J. B., Fernández de Córdova, I., & Solis Cabrera, V. (2017). Análisis de la seguridad integral en los procesos electorales: Caso proceso electoral 2017 de Ecuador. Revista de Derecho Electoral, (22), 105-130.
Rosas, G. (2010). Trust in elections and the institutional design of electoral authorities: Evidence from Latin America. Electoral Studies, 29(1), 74-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2009.09.006
Rosero Estupiñan, S. M., & Jiménez-Hernández, C. N. (2023). Gestión de tecnología en el escrutinio electoral en Colombia. Revista CEA, 9(20), e2338. https://doi.org/10.22430/24223182.2338
Toapanta, S. M. T., Sañicela, S. X. R., Valencia, D. W. B., & Gallegos, L. E. M. (2019). Analysis of Information Security for a Voting Process for Sectional Governments in Ecuador. Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, 4(5), 352-359. https://doi.org/10.25046/aj040546
Velásquez-Reyes, F. G., Briones-Cedeño, G. E., & Loor-Morales, A. J. (2024). Gestión electoral y políticas públicas. Revista Científica Arbitrada de Investigación en Comunicación, Marketing y Empresa REICOMUNICAR, 7(13), 2-10.
Zimon, D., Madzik, P., & Domingues, P. (2020). Development of Key Processes along the Supply Chain by Implementing the ISO 22000 Standard. Sustainability, 12(15), 6176. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12156176
Zotaminga, S. (2021). La representación política a través del sistema electoral: Fragmentación y Diseño Institucional. Sociología y Política HOY, 6, 87-101.
Copyright (c) 2025 Miguel Patricio Barrionuevo- Zurita, Diego Marcelo Cordero- Guzmán, Daniel Andrade- Pesantez
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
