Standardized protocol for taking and recording vital signs: Accuracy and safety in Clinical Practice
Abstract
A protocol responds to the concept of procedure and represents a series of actions aimed at the development of a basic activity or a technique with a care objective. The taking and recording of vital signs exclusive to nursing and essential for the clinical evaluation of the patient has been faced with certain disagreements regarding their number, which fluctuates between three and seven signs. Develop a nursing protocol for taking and recording the four vital signs: pulse, temperature, blood pressure and respiratory rate, reaffirming its methodological rigor and ratifying the need to update information on new, more accurate devices without forgetting the focus on continuous improvement as an indicator of health care. We reviewed publications inherent to protocols as tools that measure nursing care with an impact on the patient, the family and the community. The appropriate information is that which refers to the four as vital signs whose semiology based on physiology requires minimal skills and equipment, but which is currently reinforced with increasingly accurate devices and methods in obtaining data thanks to the development of electronic and digital technologies. Based on the principles of clinical and surgical nursing published in the last five years, a care protocol was developed for the taking and recording of vital signs. Protocolizing care forces us to deepen our knowledge, favors scientific research and facilitates the identification in the medical literature of the best scientific evidence to decide on the most appropriate strategy to promote the benefit for the patient and displace the less effective ones.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Alshehry, A. S., Cruz, J. P., Bashtawi, M. A., Almutairi, K. O., & Tumala, R. B. (2021). Nursing students’ knowledge, competence, and attitudes towards vital signs monitoring during clinical practice. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 30(5-6), 664–675. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15586
Alshehry, A. S. (2024). Attitude toward vital signs monitoring and its predictors among clinical nurses in Saudi Arabia. Frontiers in Public Health, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1454851
Babu, M., Lautman, Z., Lin, X., Sobota, M. H. B., & Snyder, M. P. (2024). Wearable devices: Implications for precision medicine and the future of healthcare. Annual Review of Medicine, 75, 401–415. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-med-052422-020437
Bayne, C. (1997). Vital signs: Are we monitoring the right parameters? Nursing Management, 28(5).
Bhaltadak, V., Ghewade, B., & Yelne, S. (2024). A comprehensive review on advancements in wearable technologies: Revolutionizing cardiovascular medicine. Cureus, 16(5). https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.61312
Cardona-Morrell, M., Prgomet, M., Turner, R., Nicholson, M., & Hillman, K. (2016). Effectiveness of continuous or intermittent vital signs monitoring in preventing adverse events on general wards: A systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Clinical Practice, 70(10), 806–824.
Churpek, M., Yuen, T., & Edelson, D. (2013). Predicting clinical deterioration in the hospital: The impact of outcome selection. Resuscitation, 84(5), 564–568.
De la Luz Lagunas, S., Elizalde de la Cruz, J., Delgado Jacobo, D. P., & Delgado Jacobo, D. P. (2024). El papel que juega la enfermera en la toma de signos vitales, somatometría y alimentación. Psic-Obesidad, 14(54), 22–25.
Güven, D., & Özbek, İ. (2022). Characteristics, treatment, and prognosis of elemental mercury intoxication in children: A single-center retrospective study. Pediatric Emergency Care, 38(10), 481–488. https://doi.org/10.1097/PEC.0000000000002834
INH Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina. (2023). Signos vitales. MedlinePlus. https://medlineplus.gov/spanish/vitalsigns.html
Levy, N., Sturgess, J., & Mills, P. (2018). “Pain as the fifth vital sign” and dependence on the “numerical pain scale” is being abandoned in the US: Why? British Journal of Anaesthesia, 120(3), 435–438. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aex351
Lima, C. (2005). Ensaios clínicos: vulnerabilidade e relativismo ético [Clinical trials: Vulnerability and ethical relativism]. Acta Medica Portuguesa, 18(3), 221–226.
Lockwood, C., Conroy-Hiller, T., & Page, T. (2004). Vital signs. JBI Library of Systematic Reviews, 2(6), 1–38.
MSP, Ministerio de Salud Pública del Ecuador. (2014). Norma técnica para unidades asistenciales docentes Acuerdo Ministerial 4604. Registro Oficial Suplemento 377.
O’Driscoll, R., Turicchi, J., Beaulieu, K., Scott, S., Matu, J., Deighton, K. (2020). How well do activity monitors estimate energy expenditure? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the validity of current technologies. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 54(6), 332–340. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2019-101491
Padilla, R., & Mayo, A. (2018). A clinical deterioration: A concept analysis. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 27(7-8), 1360–1368.
Recmanik, M., Martinek, R., Nedoma, J., Jaros, R., Pelc, M., Hajovsky, R., Velicka, J., Pies, M., Sevcakova, M., & Kawala-Sterniuk, A. (2024). A review of patient bed sensors for monitoring of vital signs. Sensors (Basel), 24(15), 4767. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24154767
Singhal, A., Prafull, K., Daulatabad, V., John, N., & John, J. (2023). Arterial oxygen saturation: A vital sign? Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice, 26(11), 1591–1594. https://doi.org/10.4103/njcp.njcp_2026_21
Tibeihaho, H., Nkolo, C., Onzima, R. A., Ayebare, F., & Henriksson, D. K. (2021). Continuous quality improvement as a tool to implement evidence-informed problem solving: Experiences from the district and health facility level in Uganda. BMC Health Services Research, 21(1), 83. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06061-8
University of Rochester Medical Center Rochester, NY. (2024). Health encyclopedia. https://n9.cl/cg2d
World Health Organization [WHO]. (2020). Servicios de salud de calidad. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/quality-health-services
Wilson, R., Godfrey, C. M., Sears, K., Medves, J., Ross-White, A., & Lambert, N. (2015). Exploring conceptual and theoretical frameworks for nurse practitioner education: A scoping review protocol. JBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports, 13(10), 146–155. https://doi.org/10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2150
Copyright (c) 2025 Martha Yolanda Villavicencio Orellana, Claudia Jazmín Niño Peñaranda, Luisa Bustamante

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.