Prácticas pedagógicas de aprendizaje mixto para mejorar la autonomía de aprendizaje de los alumnos y los resultados académicos en el aprendizaje
Resumen
Este estudio investigó si el aprendizaje combinado era más efectivo para inculcar la autonomía del alumno y mejorar los resultados académicos entre los estudiantes en comparación con las prácticas de aprendizaje convencionales. El estudio utilizó un diseño cuasi-experimental. Los participantes del estudio fueron 78 estudiantes de secundaria inferior. El estudio llevó a cabo dos métodos de enseñanza diferentes; un aula de aprendizaje mixto para el grupo de tratamiento, mientras que un aula de aprendizaje convencional para el grupo de control. Había 40 alumnos en el grupo de tratamiento y 38 alumnos en el grupo de control. Se llevó a cabo un análisis posterior a la prueba para comprender la efectividad del aprendizaje combinado hacia el logro académico de los estudiantes. Se desarrolló un conjunto de cuestionarios para identificar la autonomía del alumno después del tratamiento. Los resultados indicaron que hubo un aumento significativo en el rendimiento académico basado en los análisis pre y post-test. El estudio también encontró que las prácticas pedagógicas de aprendizaje mixto podrían mejorar la autonomía de aprendizaje de los estudiantes en el aprendizaje
Descargas
##plugins.generic.paperbuzz.metrics##
Citas
Almasaeid, T. F. (2014). The effect of using blended learning strategy on achievement and 9th grade students. European Scientific Journal, 10(31), 133–145.
Barker, J. (2015). Benefits of hybrid classes in community colleges. Contemporary Issues In Education Research, 8(3), 143–146.
Barrio-garcía, S., Arquero, J. L., & Romero-frías, E. (2015). Personal learning environments acceptance model: The role of need for cognition , e-learning satisfaction and students ’ perceptions. Educational Technology & Society, 18(3), 129–141.
Carr, N. (2011). The shallows: What the Internet is doing to our brains. WW Norton & Company.
Cohen, L., Lawrence, M., & Keith, M. (2007). Research methods in education (6th ed.). New York: Routledge.
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: planning, conducting and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th. ed.). Boston: Pearson.
Hu, H., & Du, Z. (2013). Web-based Inquiry of Autonomy in Foreign Language Learning as an English Major in Higher Vocational College. In Advanced Technology in Teaching, 163, 45-48.
Kruk M., Pawlak M. (2014) The Use of Internet Resources in Developing Autonomy in Learning English Pronunciation: A Qualitative Study. In: Pawlak M., Bielak J., Mystkowska-Wiertelak A. (eds) Classroom-oriented Research. Second Language Learning and Teaching. Springer, Heidelberg
Mohd Azli Yeop, Wong, K.T, Noraini Mohamed Noh. (2016). Blended Learning: Literature review on the acceptance factors of the teachers based on acceptance models. Journal Of Research, Policy & Practice of Teachers & Teacher Education, 6(1), 67-85.
Mohd Azli Yeop, Wong, K.T, Noraini Mohamed Noh. (2017). The construct of factors acceptance and use of blended learning for teachers in Malaysia. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2017, 14(9), 3-13.
Mohd Azli Yeop, Wong, K.T, Pauline, S.C.G. (2016). Blended learning: Pedagogy, learning styles, and assessment activities in the classroom. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences. 3(11), 365-369.
Nasser, R., Cherif, M., & Romanowski, M. (2011). Factors that impact student usage of the learning management system in Qatari schools. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(6), 39-62.
Noraini Mohamed Noh, Wong, K.T, Mohd Azli Yeop, Norazilawati Abdullah. (2016) Blended Learning: Its implementation and promote continuing e-learning environment among student-teachers. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences. 3(11), 11-15.
Rodriguez, C. O. (2012). MOOCs and the AI-Stanford like courses: Two successful and distinct course formats for massive open online courses. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning. Retrieved August 14, 2017, from: http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/1455/2602
Sekaran, U. (2016). Research Methods for Business: A Skill Building Approach, (6th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
Vaughan, N. (2014). Student engagement and blended learning: making the assessment connection. Education Sciences, 4(4), 247–264.
Volman, M., & Van Eck, E. (2001). Gender equity and information technology in education: The second decade. Review of Educational Research, 71(4), 613-634.
Wai, C. C., & Seng, E. L. K. (2014). Exploring the effectiveness and efficiency of blended learning tools in a school of business. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 123(2002), 470–476.
Wang, Y., Han, X., & Yang, J. (2015). Revisiting the blended learning literature: using a Complex Adaptive Systems Framework. Educational Technology & Society, 18(2), 380–393.
Wong, K.T., Goh, P.S.C., ., & Siti Khatijah (2017). Exploring the affordances and obstacles of blended e-learning pedagogical practices: perspective of Malaysian teachers. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning. 5(14), 49-57.
