Discusión sobre los cursos en línea desde el punto de vista de la comunidad de investigación
Resumen
En este estudio participaron los comentarios de los estudiantes de varias facultades de una universidad de Malasia que incorpora un modelo de aprendizaje híbrido en su ecosistema educativo. El objetivo de este estudio es explorar los factores que influyen en los estudiantes en línea para participar activamente en el foro de discusión a través de la plataforma del Sistema de Gestión de Aprendizaje (LMS) que proporciona la universidad. Este estudio empleó un enfoque cualitativo que involucró a setenta y tres participantes de investigación de la universidad. Los datos cualitativos de la encuesta abierta hacia la discusión en línea se recopilaron y analizaron en función del método clásico de análisis de contenido. Los comentarios se codificaron en función de los temas predeterminados en el modelo de Comunidad de Investigación (CoI). Se descubrió que la presencia docente era un predictor principal de la efectividad de los cursos en línea ofrecidos. En otras palabras, la capacidad de los instructores en línea para diseñar, organizar, instruir y facilitar a través de plataformas en línea es esencial para la implementación exitosa del modelo de aprendizaje híbrido.
Descargas
##plugins.generic.paperbuzz.metrics##
Citas
Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2014). Grade Change: Tracking Online Education in the United States. Babson Survey Research Group. Retrieved from http://www.onlinelearningsurvey.com/reports/gradechange.pdf
Baharudin, H., Nasir, M. K. M., Yusoff, N. M. R. N., & Surat, S. (2018). Assessing Students’ Course Satisfaction with Online Arabic Language Hybrid Course. Advanced Science Letters, 24, 350-352. https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2018.12005
Bolliger, D. U., & Martindale, T. (2004). Key factors for determining student satisfaction in online courses. International journal on e-learning, 3(1), 61-67.
Cobb, S. C. (2011). Social presence, satisfaction, and perceived learning of RN-to-BSN students in Web-Based nursing courses. Nursing Education Perspectives, 32(2), 115-119. doi:10.5480/1536-5026-32.2.115 Coffey & Atkinson (1996). Making sense of qualitative data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Croxton, R. A. (2014). The role of interactivity in student satisfaction and persistence in online learning. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 10(2), 314-324.
Demiray, U., Vainio, L., Sahin, M. C., Kurubacak, G., T Lounaskorpi, P., Rao, S. R., & Machado, C. (Ed.). (2010). Cases on challenges facing e-learning and national development: Institutional studies and practices. Eskisehir-Turkey: Anadolu University.
Garrison, D. R., & Anderson, T. (2003). E-Learning in the 21st century: A framework for research and practice. New York, NY: Routledge Falmer.
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. Internet and Higher Education, 2(2–3), 8-105. doi:10.1016/s1096-7516(00)00016-6.
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2010a). The first decade of the community of inquiry framework: A retrospective. Internet and Higher Education, 13(1–2), 5-9. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.10.003
Garrison, D. R., Cleveland-Innes, M., & Fung, T. S. (2010b). Exploring causal relationships among teaching, cognitive and social presence: Student perceptions of the community of inquiry framework. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(1–2), 31-36. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.10.002
Grady, J. R. (2013). Improving student satisfaction with large-scale, compressed timeline online courses. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 14(4), 195-208.
Hostetter, C., & Busch, M. (2006). Measuring up online: The relationship between social presence and student learning satisfaction. Journal of Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 6(2), 1-12.
Howell, G. F., Jeffrey, M., & Buck, J. M. (2012). The adult student and course satisfaction: What matters most?. Innovation High Education, 37, 215–226. doi:10.1007/s10755-011-9201-0
Kementerian Pendidikan Tinggi Malaysia [KPTM]. (2013). Indikator Pengajian Tinggi Malaysia 2013 Retrieved from http://www.mohe.gov.my/web_statistik/Indikator_Pengajian_Tinggi_Mala ysia_2013.pdf
Khalid, N. M., & Quick, D. (2016). Teaching Presence Influencing Online Students’ Course Satisfaction at an Institution of Higher Education. International Education Studies, 9, 62. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v9n3p62
Knowles, M. S., Holton, E. F., & Swanson, R. A. (2011). The adult learner: The definitive classic in adult education and human resource development (7th ed.). Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
Lacey, S., & Lawson, R. (2013). Multisensory imagery. New York: Springer. Miles, M.B., & Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis, 2nd Edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Mohammad, R., Jamaluddin, K., Suradi, N. R. M., & Mohamed, H. (2014). The perception on the importance and satisfaction of UKM lecturers towards elearning utilization. In M. A. Abdullah, W. K. Yahya, N. Ramli, S. R. Mohamed, & B. E. Ahmad (Eds.) Regional Conference on Science, Technology and Social Sciences (pp. 531-542). doi:10.1007/978-981-10-1458-1_49
Nasir, M. K. M., Surat, S., Maat, S. M., Abd Karim, A., & Daud, Md. Y. (2018). Confirmatory Factor Analysis on the Sub-Construct of Teaching Presence’s in the Community of Inquiry. Creative Education, 9, 2245-2253. doi:10.4236/ce.2018.914165
Nordin, N., & Norman, H. (2018). Cross-culture learning via massive open online courses for higher education. Jurnal Pendidikan Malaysia 43(1)(2018): 35-39. doi:10.17576/JPEN-2018-43.01-05
Roblyer, M. D., & Wiencke, W. R. (2003). Design and use of a rubric to assess and encourage interactive qualities in distance courses. American Journal of Distance Education, 17(2), 77-98. doi:10.1207/s15389286ajde1702_2
Rovai, A. P., & Downey, J. R. (2010). Why some distance education programs fail while others succeed in a global environment. Internet and Higher Education, 13(3), 141-147. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.07.001
So, H., & Brush, T. A. (2008). Student perceptions of collaborative learning, social presence and satisfaction in a blended learning environment: Relationships and critical factors. Computers & Education, 51(1), 318-336. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2007.05.009
Spears, L. R. (2012). Social presence, social interaction, collaborative learning, and satisfaction in online and face-to-face courses (Doctoral dissertation). Iowa State University, Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses: Full text (Order No. 3548436)
Swan, K. (2001). Virtual interaction: Design factors affecting student satisfaction and perceived learning in asynchronous online courses. Distance Education, 22(2), 306-331. doi:10.1080/0158791010220208
Wicks, D. A., Craft, B. B., Mason, G. N., Gritter, K., Bolding, K. (2015). An investigation into the community of inquiry of blended classrooms by a Faculty Learning Community, The Internet and Higher Education, 25, 53-62, doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.12.001.
Yu, T., Richardson, J. C (2015). Examining reliability and validity of a Korean version of the Community of Inquiry instrument using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Internet and Higher Education, 25, 45-52. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.12.004.
Zhan, Z., & Mei, H. (2013). Academic self-concept and social presence in face-to-face and online learning: Perceptions and effects on students’ learning achievement and satisfaction across environments. Computer & Education, 69, 131-138. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2013.07.002
