Comportamiento ruidoso de los residentes de un edificio de apartamentos como una cuestión de ley de vecindad (el caso de la relación entre dueños de perros y vecinos)
Resumen
El objetivo de este estudio es examinar en detalle un segmento de la ley del vecindario como las relaciones de vecinos relacionadas con el silencio en un edificio de apartamentos. La ley de vecindad, a pesar de su larga existencia en los sistemas legales de países extranjeros, sigue siendo inespecífica en la regulación de las relaciones entre los propietarios de apartamentos, mientras que en Rusia la ley de vecindad no ha recibido la debida atención del legislador federal. Creemos que la competencia entre el derecho público y privado en este tema debe resolverse a favor del derecho privado. La ley civil en el estado actual tiene un gran potencial para la regulación de las relaciones vecinales y la protección de los derechos vecinales. Las posibilidades del derecho civil en esta área deberían ampliarse en el curso de la próxima reforma de la legislación de propiedad. Es necesario continuar el desarrollo de la ley de vecindad en Rusia.
Descargas
##plugins.generic.paperbuzz.metrics##
Citas
buildings and in territory of inhabited building. The decision of the State Committee of Sanitary and Epidemiological Surveillance of the Russian Federation. Consultant Plus Reference System.
Altai Regional Legislative Assembly. (2017). Available from: http://www.akzs.ru/cache/6059-3a-537-2017sOprVSRFot04.10.17.pdf/ (Accessed on 06.08.2019).
Animal Housing and Protection in the Altai Territory. (2017). Law of Altai Krai. № 96-ЗС. Available from: http://docs.cntd.ru/document/450377806/ (Accessed on 06.08.2019).
Black’s Law Dictionary. (2009). B. A. Garner. (Ed.). St. Paul: West Group.
Civil Code of Czech Republic. (2005). Ministry of Justice. Available from: http://obcanskyzakonik.justice.cz/images/pdf/Civil-Code.pdf/
Civil Code of the Russian Federation. (2005). Consultant Plus Reference System.
Civil Code. (2008). Book 3: Patrimonial law: draft of the Supreme Editorial Commission for drafting the Civil Code (with explanations extracted from the works of the Editorial Commission). Moscow. Walters Klover.
Code of Administrative Offences of the Russian Federation. (2018). Consultant Plus Reference System.
Constitution of the Russian Federation. (1993). Consultant Plus Reference System.
Decision of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation. (2008). Case 59-G08-12. Garant Reference System.
Decision of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation. (2011a). Case 64-G11-36. Garant Reference System.
Decision of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation. (2011b). Case 55-APG14-11. Garant Reference System.
Decision of Supreme Court of the Russian Federation. (2012a). Case 81-APG12-1. Garant Reference System.
Decision of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation. (2012b). Case 46-APG12-14. Garant Reference System.
Decision of the Nagatinsky District Court of Moscow. (2014). Case 2-5163/2014.
Decision of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation. (2015a). Case 74-APG15-15. Garant Reference System.
Decision of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation. (2015b). Case 46-APG15-39. Garant Reference System.
Decision of the Sverdlovsk District Court. (2015c). Case 2-2309/2015. Available from: https://sudact.ru/regular/doc/ZVvAG8SRKooH/ (Accessed 06.08.2019).
Decision of the Severouralsk City Court. (2016). Case 2-788/2016. Available from: https://sudact.ru/regular/doc/fpTacz6gnJdj/ (Accessed 06.08.2019).
Decision of the Leninsky District Court of Barnaul. (2017a). Case 12-100/17. Archive of the Leninsky District Court of Barnaul.
Decision of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation. (2017b). Case 10-APG17-1. Garant Reference System.
Decision of the Altai Territory Court. (2017c). Case 3a-537/2017. Available from: http://www.akzs.ru/cache/6059-3a-537-2017sOprVSRFot04.10.17.pdf/ (Accessed on 06.08.2019).
Decision of the Judicial Collegium for Administrative Cases of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation. (2017d). Case 51-APG17-16. Available from: http://www.akzs.ru/cache/6059-3a-537-2017sOprVSRFot04.10.17.pdf/ (Accessed on 06.08.2019).
Decision of the Kalininsky District Court of Ufa, Republic of Bashkortostan. (2017e). Case 2-5744/2017. Garant Reference System.
Decision of the Mozhaisk City Court. (2017f). Case 2-1098/2017. Available from: https://jur24pro.ru/reshenie-sudov/208613/ (Accessed 06.08.2019).
Decision of the Leninsky District Court of Barnaul. (2019a). Case 12-123/2019. Archive of the Leninsky District Court of Barnaul.
Decision of the Leninskiy District Court of Barnaul. (2019b). Case 12-122/2019. Archive of the Leninskiy District Court of Barnaul.
Decision of the Leninsky District Court of Barnaul. (2019c). Case 12-121/2019. Archive of the Leninsky District Court of Barnaul.
Decision of the Leninsky District Court of Barnaul. (2019d). Case 12-218/2019. Archive of the Leninsky District Court of Barnaul.
Decision of the Leninsky District Court of Barnaul. (2019e). Case 12-240/19. Archive of the Leninsky District Court of Barnaul.
Decision of the Tchaikovsky City Court of the Perm Territory. (2019f). Case 12-342/12. Garant Reference System.
Emelkina, I.A. (2016). Institute of Restriction of Property Rights in favor of neighbors (neighborhood law) in Russian law and in the law of certain European countries. Civil Law Herald, 2, 79-112.
Emelkina, I.A., Syubaeva, Y.D. (2017). Neighborhood law in civil law of Germany, Austria, Switzerland, France, USA: essence and regularities of development. Social and Political Sciences, 6, 70–73.
German Civil Code. (2008). Moscow. Walters Klover.
GOST R 56391-2015. (2015). National Standard of the Russian Federation. Services for non-productive animals. Housing of non-productive animals in urban conditions. General Requirements. Rosstandart order No. 268. Consultant Plus Reference System.
Hulsroj, P. (2006). To The Rescue, All Hands: The Good Neighbour Principle In International Law. (pp. 167–190). In J. Allain & S. Mullally (Eds.). The Irish Yearbook of International: Volume 1. London: Hart Publishing. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5040/9781472564269.ch-005
Human Rights Act. (1998). UK Legislation. Available from: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1998/42/enacted.
Hylton, K.N. (2015). Nuisance. Forthcoming in Encylopedia of Law and Economics. J. Backhaus (Ed.). Boston Univ. School of Law, Law and Economics Research Paper No. 14-60.
Kozlov, Y.M. (1999). Administrative law. Moscow. Lawyer.
Nolan, D. (2011a). A Tort Against Land: Private Nuisance as a Property Tort (pp. 459-490). D. Nolan and A. Robertson (Eds.). Rights and Private Law. Oxford. Hart Publishing.
Nolan, D. (2011b). Nuisance and Human Rights (pp. 165-194). In The Impact of the UK Human Rights Act on Private Law. David Hoffmann (Ed). Cambridge University Press.
Nolan, D. (2015). Nuisance, Planning and Regulation: The Limits of Statutory Authority (pp. 183-206). In Defences in Tort. Dyson, Goudkamp and Wilmot-Smith (Eds.). Oxford. Hart Publishing.
Novitskiy, I. (1924a). Neighborhood right (General limits of land plots use). Law and life. Books 7-8, 10–21.
Novitsky, I. (1924b). Neighborhood Law. Framework and meaning of the problem. Law and life. Book. 5-6, 3–12.
On administrative responsibility for committing offences in the territory of Altai Krai. (2002). Law of Altai Krai No. 46-ZS. Available from: http://docs.cntd.ru/document/940002330/ (Accessed on 06.08.2019).
On Amendments to Parts 1-4 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation. (2019). Draft Federal Law 7538-6. Available from: http://docs.cntd.ru/document/902339437/ (Accessed on 06.08.2019).
On approval of SanPiN 2.1.2.2645-10. (2010). Sanitary-and-epidemiologic requirements to living conditions in residential buildings and premises. Resolution of the Chief State Sanitary Doctor of the Russian Federation. Consultant Plus Reference System.
On ensuring silence and peace of citizens in the Altai Territory. (2017). Law of Altai Krai 95-ЗС. Available from: http://docs.cntd.ru/document/450377807/ (Accessed on 06.08.2019).
On environmental protection. (2002). Federal Law 7-FZ. Consultant Plus Reference System.
On Responsible Treatment of Animals and Amendments to Certain Legislative Acts of the Russian Federation. (2018). Federal Law 498-FZ. Consultant Plus Reference System.
On Sanitary and Epidemiological Welfare of the Population. (1999). Federal Law 52-FZ. Consultant Plus Reference System.
Scott, S. (2017). Recent Developments in case law regarding neighbor law and its influence on the concept of ownership. Heinonline. Available from: https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/stelblr16&i=445/
Shershenevich, G.F. (2001). Course of civil law. Tula. Autograph.
Squires, P. (2008). The criminalisation of nuisance. Policy Press.
The Max Planck encyclopedia of European private law. (2017). J. Basedow, K.J. Hopt, R. Zimmermann, A. Stier. (Eds.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tikhomirov, Yu.A. (2001). Administrative law and process: full course. Moscow.
Tlesarev, S. (2016). Tilly-Tilly, Tilly-bom is a new cat’s house. Housing law, 11, 43–52.
Van der Merve. (1998). For whom the bell tolls - a solution in neighbor law. Stellenbosch Law Review, 9, 35
