Sistemas de educación profesional en Alemania y Turquía: análisis comparativo
Resumen
Los desafíos de la globalización, que afectaron los procesos geopolíticos y económicos, la transformación del mercado laboral y la internacionalización de la educación, han configurado la urgencia del problema. El propósito del artículo es comparar los sistemas de educación vocacional en Alemania y Turquía (utilizando el sistema dual como ejemplo) para identificar las posibilidades de transferir ideas y prácticas del sistema de educación dual. Un análisis comparativo es el método de investigación líder, que utiliza el contexto, la transferencia y la metodología de pronóstico. La descripción y comparación de los elementos principales del contexto permiten determinar las posibilidades y condiciones de la transferencia del sistema educativo dual. Los hallazgos brindan la oportunidad de identificar los riesgos de transferencia y predecir las consecuencias de los préstamos. La importancia de los resultados de la investigación consiste en el contexto, la transferencia y el pronóstico que se justifican como elementos de análisis comparativo y se aplica esta metodología a los procesos de educación profesional.
Descargas
##plugins.generic.paperbuzz.metrics##
Citas
Akpinar T., & Gun, S. (2016). Testing the human capital development model: the case of apprenticeships in Turkey. International Journal of Traning and Development, 20(2), 215-223.
Arslan, R., Tekin, Yu., Uazici, M., Kus, A., & Kaynak, G. (2009). A modular training project for vocational education and improvement in Turkey. Industry and Higher Education, 23(2), 127-132.
Aybede, Y., & Orbay, B. (2016). Comparison of economic benefits of university and vocational high school education among different majors in Turkey. European journal of higher education, 6(2), 176-192.
Aydin, S. (2013). Transformation of Turkish Vocational and Technical Education. Scientific Journal of Education Technology, 3(12), 188-196.
Barabasch, A., & Petrick, S. (2012). Mulri-level policy transfer in Turkey and its impact on the development of the vocational education and training sector. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 10(1), 119-143.
Bolat, Ya. (2015). Teacher training for vocational and technical education in Turkey, Germany, US, Australia, France, UK and Japan. Uşak Üniversitesi Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 2(3), 39-72.
Brown, A., Kirpal, S., & Rauner, F. (2007). Identities at work. The Netherlands: Springer.
Cowen, R. (2006). Acting comparatively upon the educational world: Puzzles and possibilities. Oxford Review of Education, 32(5), 561-573.
European Training Foundation. (2013). Mapping of VET educational policies and practices for social inclusion and social cohesion in the Western Balkans, Turkey and Israel. Country report: Turkey.
Heine, G. (1994). The History of Religion and Philosophy in Germany. Moscow: Progress.
Kasavin, I.T. (2008). Text. Discourse. Context. Introduction to the social epistemology of a language. Moscow. Canon.
Kershenshtainer, G. (2017). Three Lectures on Vocational Training. Trieste Publishing Pty Limited.
Khadartseva, L.S., & Kokoeva, Z.V. ( 2018). Influence of the Protestant work ethic on the development of the economy. Retrieved from http://baznica.info/article/vliyanie-protestanstkoj-trudovoj-etiki-na-razvitie/
Landman, T. (2003). Issues and Methods in comparative Politics. New York: Routledge.
Little, A. (2000). Development studies and comparative education: context, content, comparison and contributors. Comparative Educattion, 36(3), 279-296.
Mulder, M. (2017). Competence-based vocational and professional education. Springer Int. Publ.
Obolenskaya, S.V. (1992). Bismarck’s politics and the struggle of parties in Germany in the late 70s of the 20th century. Moscow: Nauka.
Phillips, D., Ochs, K. (2004). Researching policy borrowing: Some methodological challenges in comparative education. British Educational Research Journal, 30(6), 773-784.
Pizmony-Levy, O. (2011). Bridging the global and local in understanding curricula scripts: the case of environmental education. Comparative Education Review, 55(4), 600-633.
Pleshakova, A. (2019). Germany’s dual education system: the assessment by its subjects. Образование и наука. Научный журнал, 21(5), 130-157.
Shchedrovitsky, P.G. (2018). Introduction to philosophical and pedagogical anthropology. Ros. Polit. Press. Encyclopedia.
Soong-Yong, P. (2004). Cultural politics and vocational religious education: the case of Turkey. Comparative Education, 40(3), 331-341.
Steiner-Khamsi, G. (2014). Comparison and Context: the interdisciplinary approach to the comparative study of education. Current Issues in Comparative Education, 34-42.
Stenstrom, M.-L., & Lasonen, J. (2000). Strategies for reforming initial vocational education and training in Europe. Final Report of the Project. Leonard da Vinci. Transnational Pilot Projects: Multiplier Effect, Strand III.3.a. Jyväskylä: Institute for Educational Research, University of Jyväskylä, 130-145.
Tobin, J., Hsueh, Y., & Karasawa, M. (2009). Preschool in three cultures revisited: china, Japan and the United State. Chicago: University of Chicago Pres.
Verger, A. (2011). Framing and selling global education policy: the promotion of public-private partnership for education in low-income contexts. Journal of Education Policy.
Wolf, S. (2014). International TVET transfer project: Experiences of workplace training with the workforce in the Egyptian construction industry. In Wolf, S., Meyser, J. (Eds.). Policy transfer in technical and vocational education to Egypt: General conditions, concepts and experiences (pp. 30–53). Berlin: Universitätsverlag der TU Berlin.
