La diversidad de adversidades con evaluación de propiedades psicométricas en categorías juveniles a través del modelo Rasch
Resumen
Este estudio se centrará en varios aspectos, como el patrón de distribución de elementos de las adversidades en las categorías juveniles, el patrón en la confiabilidad y el índice de separación de los elementos y las personas en la medición de las adversidades en las categorías juveniles, el patrón en las curvas de probabilidad de categoría en las categorías juveniles, y el patrón en la unidimensionalidad del ítem entre las categorías juveniles. La investigación proporcionó evidencias empíricas sobre la evaluación psicométrica de la medición de la adversidad recientemente desarrollada utilizando la teoría psicométrica moderna. Esta información es valiosa para expandir la investigación sobre la juventud específicamente en la diferenciación de respuestas basadas en perfiles demográficos.
Descargas
##plugins.generic.paperbuzz.metrics##
Citas
Azrilah Abdul Aziz, Mohd Saidfudin Masodi, & Azami Zaharim. (2013). Asas model pengukuran Rasch: pembentukan skala dan struktur pengukuran. Bangi: Penerbit UKM.
Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2015). Applying the Rasch model: fundamental measurement in the human sciences. New Jersey: Routledge.
Eakman, A. M. (2012). Measurement characteristics of the engagement in meaningful activities survey in an age-diverse sample. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 66(2), 20–29. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2012.001867.
Embretson, S. E., & Reise, S. P. (2000). Item response theory for psychologists. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Fisher, J. W. P. (2007). Rating scale instrument quality criteria. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 21(1), 1095.
Gay, L. R., & Mills, G. E. (2018). Educational research: competencies for analysis and applications (12th ed.). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Merrill Prentice Hall.
Hair, J. F., Celsi, M. W., Oritinau, D. J., & Bush, R. P. (2017). Essentials of marketing research (4th ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.
Indeks Belia Malaysia, M. (2015). Indeks Belia Malaysia 2015. Institut Penyelidikan Pembangunan Belia Malaysia, 2015, 1–96.
Institut Penyelidikan Pembangunan Belia Malaysia (IYRES). (2016). Penilaian Outcome Indeks Belia Malaysia 2016 (IBM ’ 16) Mengukur Tahap Kualiti & Kesejahteraan Hidup Belia Malaysia. Retrieved from http://www.ippbm.gov.my/images/ibm/FINAL_IBM2016.pdf
Institute for Youth Research Malaysia (IYRES). (2016). Penilaian Outcome Indeks Belia Malaysia 2016 ; Mengukur Tahap Kualiti & Kesejahteraan Hidup Belia Malaysia (Vol. 2016).
Linacre, J. M. (2005). A user’s guide to WINSTEPS: Rasch Model Computer Programs. Chicago: MESA Press.
Linacre, J. M. (2007). A User’s Guide to WINSTEPS: Ministep Rasch Model Computer Programs. Chicago: MESA Press.
Linacre, J. M. (2012). A user’s guide to WINSTEPS: Rasch Model Computer Programs. Chicago: MESA Press.
Ministry of Youth and Sports Malaysia. (2015). Executive Summary: Malaysian Youth Policy. Putrajaya.
Mohd Effendi Ewan Mohd Matore (2019a). Structural Equation Model ( SEM ) in assimilating EQ , SQ and AQ for mechanical students ’ context. Proceedings of Mechanical Engineering Research Day 2019, (August), 230–231. Melaka: Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka.
Mohd Effendi Ewan Mohd Matore (2019b). The impact of EQ , SQ and IQ towards AQ using path analysis and Rasch logit for modelling purpose among mechanical engineering students. Proceedings of Mechanical Engineering Research Day 2019, (August), 225–226. Melaka: Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka.
Mohd Effendi Ewan Mohd Matore, & Ahmad Zamri Khairani. (2018). Comparison of Rasch Model Logits and Likert Mean Score in Testing the Normality Assumption. The Journal of Social Sciences Research, 6(Special Issue), 75–82.
Mohd Effendi Ewan Mohd Matore, Ahmad Zamri Khairani, Siti Mistima Maat, Nor Adila Ahmad, & Effa Rina Mohd Matore. (2018). The Influence of Intellectual Quotient (IQ), Emotional Quotient (EQ) and Spiritual Quotient (SQ) against Adversity Quotient (AQ) on polytechnic students in Malaysia. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, Special Is(2018), 83–91.
Nurauliani Jamlus Rafdi, Noor Aimi Mohamad Puad, Wan Shahdila Shah Shahar, Fadilah Mat Nor, & Wan Shazlinda Shah Shahar. (2015). Faktor-faktor Muflis Di Kalangan Belia. Proceeding of the 2nd International Conference on Management and Muamalah 2015 (2ndICoMM), 2015(November), 484–488.
Reckase, D. (1979). Unifactor latent trait models applied to multifactor tests: Results and implications. Journal of Educational Statistics, 4(3), 207–230. https://doi.org/10.3102/10769986004003207
Rubayah Yakob, Hawati Janor, & Nur Ain Khamis. (2015). Tahap Literasi Kewangan dalam Kalangan Pelajar Universiti Awam: Kajian di Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Jurnal Personalia Pelajar, 18(1), 98–117.
Stoltz, P. G., & Weihenmayer, E. (2010). The adversity advantage: turning everyday struggles into everyday greatness (2nd ed.). New York: Fireside.
Vagias, W. M. (2006). Likert-Type Scale Response Anchors (Vol. 7, pp. 1–2). Vol. 7, pp. 1–2. https://doi.org/10.5923/j.economics.20170706.02
Wright, Benjamin D. (1993). “Logits”? Rasch Measurement Transactions, 7(2), 288.
Wright, Benjamin Drake, & Masters, G. N. (1982). Rating scale analysis Rasch measurement. Chicago: MESA Press.
