Integration of Spatial Visualization Tasks to Enhance Students’ Levels of Geometric Thinking following the Van Hiele Model: A Basis for the Development of a Definitive Guide in Geometry

  • Robin B. Dimla Don Honorio Ventura Technological State University - PHILIPPINES
  • Dynah M. Soriano Don Honorio Ventura Technological State University - PHILIPPINES
Keywords: patial visualization; geometric thinking; van Hiele Model; definitive guide; Solid Geometry

Abstract

Students who have the ability to manipulate shapes in free play situations, such as building, solving spatial problems, drawing two and three-dimensional objects, exploring shapes through physical actions, describing shapes from different perspectives, and fitting shapes together are commonly observed to have a more advanced level of Geometric thinking. From this perspective students’ level of geometric thinking is associated with spatial visualization ability. Hence, the study was conducted specifically to develop a definitive guide integrating spatial visualization tasks to enhance students’ level of geometric thinking following the van Hiele model of instruction. The pre-experimental research design was employed with a definitive instructional guide as the final output of the study. The subjects of the study consist of one intact class of Bachelor of Secondary Education Major in Mathematics who are enrolled in Math 213c (Solid Geometry) during the first semester of the school year 2015-2016 purposively selected for the study. The instructional guide contains instructional plans which include worksheets, activity sheets, and homework sheets integrating students’ spatial visualization tasks. All materials which were developed in the study were subjected to face and content validation through several subject area specialists. The findings reveal that there are remarkable changes for both the students’ level of geometric thinking and spatial visualization ability. It can be concluded that the integration of spatial visualization tasks is effective not only in improving students’ spatial visualization ability but also effective in assisting students raised their van Hiele level and preventing them drop their van Hiele level.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Amazigo, J.C. (2020). “Mathematics phobia diagnosis and prescription”. National Mathematics centre first annual lecture, Abuja.

Aydin, N., et.al., (2009). “The Impact of Undergraduate Mathematics Courses on College Students’ Geometric Reasoning Stages”. The Montana Mathematics Enthusiast, vol. 6, nos 1 and 2.

Brown, D.L. and Wheatley, G.H. (1990). The Role of Imagery in Mathematics Reasoning, Proceedings of the 14th Annual Meeting International Group for Psychology of Mathematics Education Conference, Vol. 1, Mexico.

Carpenter, P. A., & Just, M. A. (1986). Spatial ability: An information processing approach to psychometrics. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Advances in the psychology of human intelligence, Vol. 3. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum

Clements, D.H., Battista, M. (1990). The effects of logo on children’s conceptualization of angle and polygons. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education

Crowley, M. L. (1987). “The Van Hiele Model of the Development of Geometric Thought” In Learning and Teaching Geometry, K- 12, 1987 Yearbook of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

Fuys, D., et.al., (2012). The Van Hiele model of thinking in Geometry among adolescents. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education: Monograph No. 3, 1988 In Alex, et.e. “A Survey of South African Grade 10 Learners’ Geometric Thinking Levels in Terms of the Van Hiele Theory.

Gutierrez, A. (1992). “Exploring the Links between Van Hiele Levels and 3- Dimensional Geometry”.

Liu, K. (2005). “The effectiveness of Van Hiele-based instruction”, University of Hongkong.

Malloy, C. (2002). The Van Hiele Framework in Navigating Through Geometry in Grades 6 -8: NCTM.

Meng, C. (2009). “Pre-Service Secondary Mathematics Teachers’ Geometric Thinking and Course Grade”, Universiti Sains Malaysia.

Pegg J, & Davey G. (1998). Interpreting student understanding in Geometry: A synthesis of two models. In: R Lehrer, D Chazan (Eds.): Designing Learning Environments for Developing Understanding of Geometry and Space. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

Salau, M. O. (1995). “Analysis of students enrollment and performance in Mathematics at the senior secondary certificate level”. Journal of curriculum studies.

Simard, C., et.al. (2007). “Exploring the Van Hiele Levels of Prospective Mathematics Teachers”.

Unal, H., et. al., (2009). “Differences in Learning Geometry among High and Low Spatial Ability Pre- service Mathematics Teachers”. International Journal of Mathematics Education in Science and Technology, Vol. 40, No. 8.

Van Hiele, P. M., (1986). Structure and insight: A theory of mathematics education.

Yazdani, M. A. (2001). “Correlation between Students’ Level of Understanding according to the Van Hieles’ Model and Students’ Achievement in Plane Geometry”. Journal of Mathematical Sciences and Mathematics Education.

Published
2019-07-31
How to Cite
Dimla, R. B., & Soriano, D. M. (2019). Integration of Spatial Visualization Tasks to Enhance Students’ Levels of Geometric Thinking following the Van Hiele Model: A Basis for the Development of a Definitive Guide in Geometry. Religación, 4(17), 311-320. Retrieved from https://revista.religacion.com/index.php/religacion/article/view/903