Unified Science Program, the Case of Organizational Studies
Abstract
The lack of the unifying factor in the so-called organizational studies, which is the scientific intention that derives from the project: Search for Identity of Organizational Studies (unified science), three concepts that are articulated to the Research Program of Organizational Studies: self-organization, transmodernity and the concept of transdisciplinarity as a higher stage in the development of a new paradigm. The hierarchical structure model of Jantsch science is used. This model allows us to discover the unifying language that coordinates the theories and methodologies of disciplines that have their epistemic origin in different origins, that is, nomothetic and ideographic, an example of which is the hidden third; the second and third order, transmodernity and transdisciplinarity. The latter is an ideal as organizing languages of the model in Organizational Studies. Jantsch argues that the maturation of conceptual and categorical structures and fundamental theoretical premises generate general sequential models of thought for the analysis or study of organizations that could lead to a general theory or metatheory, similar to Systems Theory or structures. Considering the emerging paradigm of self-organization, principles can be found that unify the description of evolution into two important dimensions: (1) through the hierarchy of evolutionary dynamics from ontogeny through phylogeny and (2) through the domains of reality from the physical through biological (sociobiological, ecological) to the sociocultural-organizational field. The unification of organizational studies.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Arnold Cathalifaud, M., & Rodríguez, D. (1990). El perspectivismo en la teoría sociológica. Revista Paraguay, (78).
Bacon, F. (1818). Novum organum scientiarum.
Carnap, R. (1950). Empiricism, semantics, and ontology. Revue Internationale de Philosophie, 4, 20–40.
Comte, A. (2020). Discurso sobre el espíritu positivo. Editorial Verbum.
Corona Fernández, J., & Cortés del Moral, R. (2009). Complejidad y pensamiento crítico. Universidad de Guanajuato.
Descartes, R. (2012). Discurso del método. EDAF.
Friedman, M. (1974). Explanation and Scientific Understanding. The Journal of Philosophy, 71(1), 5–19. https://doi.org/10.2307/2024924
Giménez, G. (2004). Pluralidad y unidad de las ciencias sociales. Estudios sociológicos, 267–282.
Heckhausen, H., Schmalt, H. D., & Schneider, K. (1985). Achievement motivation in perspective. Academic Pr.
Hegel, G. W. F. H. (2011). Ciencia de la lógico. I. La lógica objetiva. Abada Editores.
Kepler, J. (1619). Harmonices mundi libri V. sumptibus Godofredi Tampachii bibl. Francof.
Kitcher, P. (1981). Explanatory Unification. Philosophy of Science, 48(4), 507–531. https://doi.org/10.1086/289019
Kitcher, P. (2021). El avance de la ciencia: Ciencia sin leyenda, objetividad sin ilusiones. Instituto de Investigaciones Filóficas.
Kuhn, S. T. (2011). La estructura de las revoluciones científicas. Fondo de cultura económica.
Leibniz, G. W. (2007). The Leibniz-Des Bosses Correspondence. Yale University Press.
Luhmann, N. (1998). Complejidad y Modenidad. Trotta Madrid.
Montaño Hirose, L. (2004). Los estudios organizacionales en México: Cambio, poder, conocimiento e identidad. Miguel Ángel Porrúa.
Morin, C. D. (1990). Introducción al pensamiento complejo. Gedisa.
Nicolescu, B. (1996). La Transdisciplinariedad Manifiesto. Multiversidad Mundo Real Edgar Morin, A.C.
Pérez Mayo, A. R., & Guzmán Cáceres, M. (2015). Los estudios organizacionales como programa de investigación. Cinta de moebio, 53, 104–123. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0717-554X2015000200001
Pérez Mayo, A. R., & Roque Nieto, N. (2022). Propiedades emergentes en el objeto de estudio de las organizaciones. El caso de la Sociología de las Organizaciones. Religación Press. https://press.religacion.com/index.php/press/catalog/book/10
Pérez-Mayo, A. R., & Roque-Nieto, N. (2020). La transmodernidad y la matriz disciplinar como propiedades emergentes en la construcción de la identidad epistémica de los estudios organizacionales. Revista de Sociología Contemporánea, 30–45. https://doi.org/10.35429/JOCS.2020.23.7.30.45
Von Bertalanffy, L. (1968). Teoría general de los sistemas. Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Wallerstein, I., & Balibar, E. (1991). Raza, nación y clase. IEPALA Editorial.
Copyright (c) 2025 Augusto Renato Pérez Mayo, Nohemí Roque Nieto

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.