Enhancing english language learning for specific purposes in military schools: Strategies to overcome academic and physical challenges
Abstract
This research evaluated the outcomes of implementing an English for Specific Purposes (ESP) program in military institutes, considering the demanding physical and academic environment cadets face. The study focused on the impact of integrating military-related materials into language instruction, assessed students’ opinions on interactive classroom activities, and identified the main obstacles to language learning. A mixed-methods design was used with 28 cadets selected from the “Tcrn. Lauro Guerreno” Military High School in Loja, Ecuador. Qualitative data were obtained from interviews and focus group discussions, while quantitative data were collected through pre- and post-tests. The intervention incorporated lessons set in military contexts, including instructional commands and modes of communication. Recommendations aimed at improving EFL instruction in military environments by strengthening teaching and learning resources, teacher professional development, and organizational culture. This research contributes to addressing gaps in context-based ESP training and proposing practical solutions to challenges in ESP teaching within military organizations.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Basturkmen, H. (2010). Developing courses in English for specific purposes. Palgrave Macmillan.
Bogusz, D. (2017). Teaching English military terminology in military classes. Polish Air Force Academy Journal, 15(2), 45-60.
Brown, H. D. (2007). Principles of language learning and teaching. Pearson Education.
Byram, M. (1997). Teaching and assessing intercultural communicative competence. Multilingual Matters.
Carless, D. (2012). Innovation in language teaching: A review of the literature. ELT Journal, 66(1), 72-82. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccr069
Chen, L., & Li, L. (2010). The impact of English for specific purposes on language proficiency in military contexts. Journal of Language Teaching, 15(2), 35–47.
Chen, L. (2024). A scoping review of 30 years of research in military English language education. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2024.2370986
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage Publications.
Dörnyei, Z., & Ushioda, E. (2011). Teaching and researching motivation. Pearson Education.
East, M. (2021). Task-based language teaching in a military context: Challenges and solutions. Language Teaching Research, 25(3), 371-392.
Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford University Press.
Ellis, R. (2008). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford University Press.
Flowerdew, J. (2013). Thematic approaches to teaching English for specific purposes. Cambridge University Press.
Gardner, R. C. (1985). The Attitude/Motivation Test Battery: Technical report. The University of Western Ontario.
Gilmore, A. (2007). Authentic materials and authenticity in foreign language learning. Language Teaching, 40(2), 97–118. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444807004144
Hutchinson, T., & Waters, A. (1987). English for specific purposes: A learning-centered approach. Cambridge University Press.
Kaur, H., Singh, R., & Patel, A. (2019). The role of English in military communication: A needs analysis approach. Journal of English for Specific Purposes, 40(3), 112-128.
Khan, S. (2020). Exploring motivation in military language education: The role of extrinsic and intrinsic factors. Journal of Military Education, 45(2), 113-127.
Krashen, S. D. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. Longman.
Kim, J. (2013). English language training for Korean naval officers: A needs analysis study. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 29(4), 89-105.
Kirkpatrick, A. (2012). English as a lingua franca in ASEAN: A multilingual model. Springer.
Kirkpatrick, A. (2021). English as a medium of instruction in global contexts: From policy to practice. Springer.
Kochetkov, A., & Kochetkova, M. (2023). Interactive methods in military English teaching: Case studies and best practices. International Journal of Military Pedagogy, 19(2), 67-82.
Lamb, T. (2017). Motivation in language learning: Exploring its role in second language acquisition. Language Teaching Research, 21(3), 287-303. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168816680175
Lin, C. (2013). English language demands of Taiwanese university students in technology domains: A needs analysis study. Taiwan Journal of ESP Research, 21(1), 54-70.
Macaro, E. (2018). Theories of second language learning. Routledge.
Nguyen, T. T. M., & Bygate, M. (2020). Teaching English in military contexts: Challenges and solutions. Language Teaching Research, 24(1), 67–81. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168818777519
Rahman, M. M., & Pandian, A. (2018). The role of motivation in English for specific purposes: An investigation into language learners’ motivations in Malaysia. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 33, 55–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2018.04.003
Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2014). Approaches and methods in language teaching. Cambridge University Press.
Shrestha, P., & Coffin, C. (2012). English for specific purposes in the workplace: A study of language teaching needs in a factory. English for Specific Purposes, 31(3), 164–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2012.02.001
Skehan, P. (2009). Modelling second language performance: A response to Ellis’s review of the task-based syllabus. Language Teaching, 42(3), 301-308. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444808005506
Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (2001). Focus on form through collaborative dialogue: Exploring task effects. The Modern Language Journal, 85(1), 58–81. https://doi.org/10.1111/0026-7902.00096
Copyright (c) 2025 Ronald Guillermo Larreátegui Zambrano, Paula Agustina Vélez Yanza
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
