Abstract
In the food and beverage sector in the city of Latacunga, Ecuador, firms face increasing competitive demands and different levels of technological adoption, while empirical evidence on the relationship between digital intensity and financial outcomes in local contexts remains limited. This study analyzes the relationship between digital intensity and financial performance using a quantitative approach with a non-experimental, correlational design. Digital intensity was measured through a structured instrument, while financial performance was evaluated using objective indicators such as ROA and ROE obtained from real financial data. The sample included 14 firms, and Spearman’s correlation coefficient was applied to examine the relationship between variables. The results show a moderate positive relationship between digital intensity and ROA, and a positive but weak relationship with ROE. The findings suggest that business digitalization is associated with financial performance in different ways, with a stronger link to operational efficiency, without implying causality.
References
Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120.
Bharadwaj, A., El Sawy, O. A., Pavlou, P. A., & Venkatraman, N. (2013). Digital business strategy: Toward a next generation of insights. MIS Quarterly, 37(2), 471–482.
Brigham, E. F., & Ehrhardt, M. C. (2017). Financial management: Theory and practice. Cengage Learning.
Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2014). The second machine age: Work, progress, and prosperity in a time of brilliant technologies. W. W. Norton & Company.
Cárdenas-Pérez, A., Ponce, D., & Ayala, K. (2022). Diagnóstico contable y financiero y su incidencia en la eficiencia empresarial del sector artesanal de la parroquia La Victoria, cantón Pujilí, provincia de Cotopaxi durante los periodos 2019–2021. Revista Publicando, 9(35), 50–63. https://doi.org/10.51528/rp.vol9.id2338
Hernández Sampieri, R., Fernández Collado, C., & Baptista Lucio, P. (2014). Metodología de la investigación. McGraw-Hill.
Kane, G. C., Palmer, D., Phillips, A. N., Kiron, D., & Buckley, N. (2015). Strategy, not technology, drives digital transformation. MIT Sloan Management Review.
Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1996). The balanced scorecard: Translating strategy into action. Harvard Business School Press.
OECD. (2020). OECD digital economy outlook 2020. OECD Publishing.
Parreño-Rivera, A. K., & Cárdenas-Pérez, A. (2023). Apalancamiento financiero en el sector de alojamiento y comidas de la provincia de Cotopaxi y su influencia en la rentabilidad en el periodo 2016–2021. Revista Prospectivas UTC, 6(1), 1–23.
Porter, M. E., & Heppelmann, J. E. (2014). How smart, connected products are transforming competition. Harvard Business Review, 92(11), 64–88.
Teece, D. J. (2018). Business models and dynamic capabilities. Long Range Planning, 51(1), 40–49.
Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533.
Verhoef, P. C., Broekhuizen, T., Bart, Y., Bhattacharya, A., Dong, J. Q., Fabian, N., & Haenlein, M. (2021). Digital transformation: A multidisciplinary reflection and research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 122, 889–901.
Vial, G. (2019). Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 28(2), 118–144.
Westerman, G., Bonnet, D., & McAfee, A. (2014). Leading digital: Turning technology into business transformation. Harvard Business Review Press.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
