Imágenes como herramientas del habla espontánea
Resumen
El artículo presenta un componente figurativo en el habla espontánea. Está comprobado que una imagen enriquece el habla y proporciona su individualización. Las imágenes dan testimonio del potencial creativo de un individuo. Representa una desviación de los clichés comunicativos aceptados. La formación experimental de palabras se considera una fuente de imágenes. El fenómeno de la semántica de abreviatura desempeña un papel importante en el proceso de nominación y renominación.
Descargas
##plugins.generic.paperbuzz.metrics##
Citas
Adonina, L., Bondareva, O., Fisenko, O. S., & Ismailova, K. (2018). The Creation of Methodology of Technical Universities Students’ Intellectual Skills Formation and Development in the Foreign Language Course. European research studies journal, 21(Special 2), 643-651.
Arutyunova N.D. (1980). Image, metaphor, symbol in the context of life and culture, Res Philologica. Philological studies. - M. L. Nauka. pp. 71–88.
Babenko N.G. (1997). Occasional in a literary text. Structural-semantic analysis: textbook. - Kaliningrad: Kaliningrad Univ., 84 p.
Baranova L.A. (2016). Abbreviations of foreign origin in modern Russian: principles and practice of lexicographic description. Neology and Neography. - SPb.: Nestor-Istoriya, pp. 9–12.
Budagov R.A. (1979). Man and his language. - M.: Moscow State University, 430 p.
Gridina T.A. (1996). Language game: stereotype and creativity. Yekaterinburg: Nauka, 225 p.
Krongauz M.A. (2004). Norm: semantic and pragmatic aspects Sacred meanings: Word. Text. Culture: Collection of articles in honor of N.D. Harutyunova. pp. 137–141.
Nechaeva I.V. (2016). Foreign-language neology: problems of written adaptation, Neology and Neography. - SPb.: Nestor-Istoriya, pp. 152–157.
Nikolina N.A. (2013). Active processes in the field of addition in modern Russian, Bulletin of the Nizhny Novgorod University named after N.A. Lobachevsky. 6 (2). pp. 171–173.
Norman B.Yu. (2011). Speaker grammar: From design to utterance. - 2nd version, rev. and add. M.: Book House “LIBROCOM”, 232 p.
Petrov A.V. (2017). Implementation of creative potential in the speech of Crimeans. Modern picture of the world: Crimean context: collective monograph Book 1 / T.V. Arzhantseva, G.Yu. Bogdanovich, S.Ya. Dikareva et al. Ed. by G.Yu. Bogdanovich. - Simferopol, pp. 45–68.
Polyanskaya, E., Fisenko, O., & Kulakova, V. (2018). Strong-Willed Character Traits in Students’ Career Orientation in the Labor Market and Self-Realization. European Research Studies, 21, 606.
Radbil T.B. (2006). Pragmasemantic anomalies in the environment of linguistic anomalies of Russian speech. Russian language in scientific coverage. 2 (12). pp. 56–79.
Remchukova E.N. (2011). The creative potential of Russian grammar: monograph. - M.: Book House “LIBROCOM”, 224 p.
Rumyantseva, N., Fisenko, O., & Suvorova, E. (2018). Russian Nietzsche: Question about Linguistic Commenting of Texts of VV Rozanov in Foreign Audience. European research studies journal, 21(Special 2), 635-642.
Toroptsev I.S. (2015). Initial moments of lexical objectification. Problems of onomasiology: scientific works. Ed. by I.S. Toroptsev. - Course: Kursk State University, 46 (139). P. 3-88
Vinogradov V.V. (1980). Selected Works. On the language of fiction. M.: Nauka, pp. 240–249.
Vinokur T.G. (2009). Regularities of the stylistic use of linguistic units. - Ed. 2nd, rev. and add. - M.: Book House “LIBROCOM”, 240 p.
Zemskaya E.A., Kitaygorodskaya M.A., Shiryaev M.A. (1981). Russian colloquial speech. General issues. Word formation. Syntax. M.: Nauka, 277 p.
