Images as spontaneous speech tools
Resumo
The article presents a figurative component in spontaneous speech. It is proved that an image enriches speech, and provides its individualization. Imagery testifies to the creative potential of an individual. It represents a deviation from accepted communicative cliches. Experimental word formation is considered as a source of imagery. A significant role is played by the phenomenon of abbreviation semantics in the process of nomination and renomination.
Downloads
##plugins.generic.paperbuzz.metrics##
Referências
Adonina, L., Bondareva, O., Fisenko, O. S., & Ismailova, K. (2018). The Creation of Methodology of Technical Universities Students’ Intellectual Skills Formation and Development in the Foreign Language Course. European research studies journal, 21(Special 2), 643-651.
Arutyunova N.D. (1980). Image, metaphor, symbol in the context of life and culture, Res Philologica. Philological studies. - M. L. Nauka. pp. 71–88.
Babenko N.G. (1997). Occasional in a literary text. Structural-semantic analysis: textbook. - Kaliningrad: Kaliningrad Univ., 84 p.
Baranova L.A. (2016). Abbreviations of foreign origin in modern Russian: principles and practice of lexicographic description. Neology and Neography. - SPb.: Nestor-Istoriya, pp. 9–12.
Budagov R.A. (1979). Man and his language. - M.: Moscow State University, 430 p.
Gridina T.A. (1996). Language game: stereotype and creativity. Yekaterinburg: Nauka, 225 p.
Krongauz M.A. (2004). Norm: semantic and pragmatic aspects Sacred meanings: Word. Text. Culture: Collection of articles in honor of N.D. Harutyunova. pp. 137–141.
Nechaeva I.V. (2016). Foreign-language neology: problems of written adaptation, Neology and Neography. - SPb.: Nestor-Istoriya, pp. 152–157.
Nikolina N.A. (2013). Active processes in the field of addition in modern Russian, Bulletin of the Nizhny Novgorod University named after N.A. Lobachevsky. 6 (2). pp. 171–173.
Norman B.Yu. (2011). Speaker grammar: From design to utterance. - 2nd version, rev. and add. M.: Book House “LIBROCOM”, 232 p.
Petrov A.V. (2017). Implementation of creative potential in the speech of Crimeans. Modern picture of the world: Crimean context: collective monograph Book 1 / T.V. Arzhantseva, G.Yu. Bogdanovich, S.Ya. Dikareva et al. Ed. by G.Yu. Bogdanovich. - Simferopol, pp. 45–68.
Polyanskaya, E., Fisenko, O., & Kulakova, V. (2018). Strong-Willed Character Traits in Students’ Career Orientation in the Labor Market and Self-Realization. European Research Studies, 21, 606.
Radbil T.B. (2006). Pragmasemantic anomalies in the environment of linguistic anomalies of Russian speech. Russian language in scientific coverage. 2 (12). pp. 56–79.
Remchukova E.N. (2011). The creative potential of Russian grammar: monograph. - M.: Book House “LIBROCOM”, 224 p.
Rumyantseva, N., Fisenko, O., & Suvorova, E. (2018). Russian Nietzsche: Question about Linguistic Commenting of Texts of VV Rozanov in Foreign Audience. European research studies journal, 21(Special 2), 635-642.
Toroptsev I.S. (2015). Initial moments of lexical objectification. Problems of onomasiology: scientific works. Ed. by I.S. Toroptsev. - Course: Kursk State University, 46 (139). P. 3-88
Vinogradov V.V. (1980). Selected Works. On the language of fiction. M.: Nauka, pp. 240–249.
Vinokur T.G. (2009). Regularities of the stylistic use of linguistic units. - Ed. 2nd, rev. and add. - M.: Book House “LIBROCOM”, 240 p.
Zemskaya E.A., Kitaygorodskaya M.A., Shiryaev M.A. (1981). Russian colloquial speech. General issues. Word formation. Syntax. M.: Nauka, 277 p.
