Características de los métodos de criminalística para cometer delitos informáticos y peculiaridades de su prevención

  • Vitaliy Polyakov Altai State University - Russia
Palabras clave: Método de cometer delitos, caracterización forense, delitos informáticos, prevención del delito.

Resumen

El artículo desarrolla un nuevo enfoque para el delito informático, que consiste en la diferenciación forense de los métodos para cometer delitos informáticos por su complejidad y nivel de peligro. Revelamos las características de los diferentes tipos de delitos informáticos y clasificamos los medios y las recepciones de las formas de alta tecnología para cometer delitos informáticos, a saber, el ciberterrorismo, el ciber-extremismo y la influencia ilegal en la infraestructura de información crítica del estado. Se ha propuesto una nueva metodología para la prevención forense de los delitos informáticos, basada en la aplicación de la tecnología Honeypot. Los resultados del trabajo permiten desarrollar la teoría criminalista moderna de los delitos en el ámbito de la información informática, mientras que los datos obtenidos durante la investigación pueden utilizarse como base científica para realizar investigaciones de delitos informáticos.

Descargas

La descarga de datos todavía no está disponible.

##plugins.generic.paperbuzz.metrics##

Cargando métricas ...

Biografía del autor/a

Vitaliy Polyakov, Altai State University - Russia

PhD, Associate Professor, Department of Criminal Procedure and Criminalistics, Altai State University, Russian Federaion.

Citas

Broadhurst, R. Grabosky, P., Alazab, M. & Chon, S. (2014). Organizations and Cyber crime: An Analysis of the Nature of Groups engaged in Cyber Crime International Journal of Cyber Criminology, 8(1), 1-20.

Cameron, S. D. (2015). Brown. Investigating and Prosecuting Cyber Crime: Forensic Dependencies and Barriers to Justice // International Journal of Cyber Criminology. Vol. 9 (1): 55–119. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.22387

Conradt C. (2012). Online Auction Fraud and Criminological Theories: The Adrian Ghighina Case. International Journal of Cyber Criminology (IJCC), 6(1), 912-923.

Diamon, B., Bachmann, M. (2015). Out of the Beta Phase: Obstacles, Challenges, and Promising Paths in the Study of Cyber Criminology. International Journal of Cyber Criminology, 9(1), 24–34. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.22196.

Garmaev, Y.P., Popova, E.I. (2016). The Organization of Anticriminal and Antiterrorist Education in the Crimean Federal District. Criminology Journal of Baikal National University of Economics and Law, 2016, 10(2), 270-279.

Holt, Th.J., Strumsky, D., Smirnova, O., Kilger, M. (2012). Examining the Social Networks of Malware Writers and Hackers. International Journal of Cyber Criminology, 6(1), 891-903.

Howell, C.J., Maimon, D., Cochran, J.K., Jones, H.M., Powers, R.A. (2017). System Trespasser Behavior after Exposure to Warning Messages at a Chinese Computer Network: An Examination. International Journal of Cyber Criminology, 11(1), 63–77. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.495772.

Meshcheryakov, V.A. (2004). Electronic Digital Objects in Criminal Proceedings and Forensics. Voronezh Forensic Readings: Research Collected Works, 5, 153-169.

Osipenko, A.L. (2010). Operative-search activity in cyberspace: answers to new challenges. Scientific Bulletin of the Omsk Academy of the Russian Ministry of Internal Affairs, 2(37), 38-43.

Parkhomenko, S.V. Evdokimov, K.N. (2015). Computer Crime Prevention in the Russian Federation: Integrative and Integrated Approaches / S.V. Parkhomenko, K.N. Evdokimov. Criminological Journal of Baikal State University of Economics and Law, 2, 265-276.

Pastukhov, P.S., Losavio, M. (2017). Ispol’zovanie informatsionnykh tekhnologiy dlya obespecheniya bezopasnosti lichnosti, obshchestva I gosudarstva [Use of Information Technology to Ensure Security of the Individual, Society and State]. Vestnik Permskogo Universiteta. Juridicheskie Nauki - Perm University Herald. Juridical Sciences, 36, 231–236. DOI:10.17072/1995-4190-2017-36-231-236.

Polyakov, V.V. (2016). Forensic analysis of relatively simple ways of committing computer crimes. South Ural Forensic Readings: Collection of Reports of All-Russian Scientific-Practical Conference. Ufa: RIC BashGU.

Polyakov, V.V. (2016). Prevention of extremism and terrorism through the Internet. Izvestia of Altai State University, 3(91), 142-144.

Polyakov, V.V. (2017). The honeypot system as an information gathering tool to combat cybercrime. Forensic science library, 1(30), 250-254.

Polyakov, V.V., Kurakin, A.V. (2018). Investigation situations of the initial stage of investigation of computer crimes committed remotely. Problems of legal and technical protection of information, 6, 113-119.

Polyakov, V.V., Lapin, S.A. (2014). Means of committing computer crimes. Reports of the Tomsk State University of Control Systems and Radioelectronics, 2(32), 162-166.

Raed, S. A. Faqir (2013). Cyber Crimes in Jordan: A Legal Assessment on the Effectiveness of Information System Crimes Law No.30 of 2010. International Journal of Cyber Criminology, 7(1), 81-90.

Semenov, A.Yu. (2004). Some Aspects of Detection, Seizure and Investigation of Traces of Computer-related Information Crime. Siberian Legal Gazette, 1.

Stratton, G., Powell, A. and Cameron, R (2017). Crime and Justice in Digital Society: Towards a ‘Digital Criminology’? International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy, 6(2), 17-33. DOI: 10.5204/ijcjsd.v6i2/355.

Sunami, A.N. (2013). Youth Extremism, Xenophobia, Intolerant Behavior: Conflict Analysis of the Russian Internet. Conflictology, 1, 178-185.

Publicado
2019-11-30
Cómo citar
Polyakov, V. (2019). Características de los métodos de criminalística para cometer delitos informáticos y peculiaridades de su prevención. Religación, 4(21), 90-97. Recuperado a partir de https://revista.religacion.com/index.php/religacion/article/view/515