Law in the context of justice
Abstract
The article analyzes the nature of justice reflected in the law. According to the authors, the source of justice is quite “earthly”, knowable and rooted in the real or imaginary interests of people. However, the notion of interest-based perceptions of justice, while methodologically significant, does not explain any particular situation itself. It is still necessary to know what interests are embodied in the relevant legal provisions. Representations of individual subjects about justice with greater or lesser adequacy reflect, first of all, their own interests. And much less they are able to assess adequately the actions of others, social movements, government authority. However, any private interests inevitably go back to more general interests, which are not monolithic in their structure, internally contradictory and sooner or later, but inevitably “return” to private interests. Justice is a reflection of diverse interests, so perceptions of justice are as volatile as perceptions of interests.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Alekseev, S. S. (1978). Right and our life. M.: Legal literature, 224 p.
Comte-Sponville, A., & Terré, J. (2003). Diccionario filosófico. Paidós.
Dermikanova, Z. N. (2019). Features grand legal responsibility of the liquidator of the ceremony, the legislation of the russian federation. International Law Journal, 1(4), 36–41.
Dray, W. H. (1971). On the nature and role of narrative in historiography. History and theory, 10(2), 153-171.
Durkheim, E. (2007). De la division du travail social. F. Alcan.
Gamulinskaya, N. V. (2018). Rights of employees in the event of the enterprise’s bankruptcy. Modern Scientist, 1, 105–108.
Hoffe, O. (1987). Politische Gerechtigkeit: Grundlegung einer kritischen Philosophie von Recht und Staat. Suhrkamp.
Höffe, O. (2015). Gerechtigkeit: eine philosophische Einführung (Vol. 2168). CH Beck.
Ilyin, I. (2014). National Russia: our tasks. M.: Eksmo: Algoritm, 464 p.
Ismailov, M. A., & Mikogazieva, S. M. (2019). Restorative mediation in the synthesis of communications of the canvas and customary law in a multiethnic space. International Law Journal, 1(1), 19–29.
Ivin, A. A. (2006). Axiology. Scientific publication. M.: Higher School, 390 p.
Jhering, R. V. (1877). Der Zweck im Recht, 2 Bde. Breitkopf 8c Härtel, Leipzig.
Levi, E. H. (1948). An introduction to legal reasoning. The University of Chicago Law Review, 15(3), 501-574.
Likhachev, D. S. (1990). O natsional’nom kharaktere russkikh [On Russian national character]. Voprosy filosofii, 4.
Mamut, L. S. (1998). Gosudarstvo v tsennostnom izmerenii [The state in the value-based dimension]. Moskva: NORMA.
Mazanaev, N. K. (2018). Legal norms of public administration of aguls. Modern Scientist, 2, 47–50.
Nersesyants, V. S. (2002). Value of law: law as a unity of equality, freedom and justice. Law as a value. Discussion materials, 75 p.
Parsons, T. (1971). The system of modern societies. Prentice Hall.
Pashukanis, E. B. (1980). Selected works on the general theory of law and the state. M.: Nauka.
Polyakov, A. V. (2004). General Theory of Law: Problems of interpretation in the context of the communicative approach. Saint-Petersburg: Saint-Petersburg University Publishing House, 740.
Rawls, J. (2009). A theory of justice. Harvard university press.
Smelser, N. J. (1995). Sociology. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, Fifth edition, P.115.
Tishkoff, G. (2003). Philosophical dictionary. M.: Republic, 575 p.
Toynbee, A. J. (1987). A Study of History: Volume I: Abridgement Of (Vol. 1). Oxford Paperbacks.
Vysotskaya, Yu. P., Vasilyeva, E. A., Markova, O. V. (2018). On the issue of economic sufficiency of legal norms in the sphere of entrepreneurial activity. Modern Scientist, 1, 109 – 112.
