Keywords
How to Cite
Abstract
The present paper analyzes definitions of the languages of Dagestan with the scope of notions of “the language of men/the language of women”. Many meaningful units of gender are updated within the framework of this classification. The material with a multitude of gender units was dispersed in the conceptual space of Russian and Dagestan languages; however, it was restored by the representation of stereotypes “noun ± adjective”. This allows justifiably to streamline the conceptual space of languages of Dagestan with many interpretations of the surrounding reality. The preference given to the aforementioned classification is because the connotative aspect of nominative units allows for the limination of overlays, i.e. cases of reference of the same interpretations to different terminological headings simultaneously.
References
Aslanov G.N. (1990). Eastern Turkic Vocabulary in Dictionaries of the Russian Language (end of XVIII first half of XIX centuries), Baku
Balashova L.V. (2014). Russian Metaphor, Past, Present, Future, M.
Baranov A. N. (2014). Descriptors Metaphor Theory, M.:
Boldyrev N.N. (2008). International Congress on Cognitive Linguistics: Sat. mat / editor, Tambow: TGU, pp. 234-239
Kharchenko V.K. (2009). Portable Meaning, Metaphor Words in Poetry and Prose, M.: Librokom
Narochnickij A.L. (1988). History of Peoples of North Caucasus Late 18th Century-1917, M.: Nauka
Sakhno S.L. (1991). Your and Other People’s in Conceptual Structures. Logical Analysis of Language. Cultural Concepts, M.: Science. pp. 95-102
Shikhalieva S. Kh. (2016). The Term Nature in the Context of the Professional Translator (To a Question of the Bible Linguistic Map), Journal of Language and Literature, Vol. 7, Issue 2, pp. 234-242.
Shikhalieva S.Kh. (2015). Cult and Culture of the Caucasus in the Palestinian Context: Speech Segment and Substrate Anomaly. The Social Sciences (Pakistan),T, 10, Issue 3, pp. 226-229
Telia V.N. (1986). Connotative Aspect of the Semantics of the Nomination, M.: Nauka