Keywords
How to Cite
Abstract
Academic literature has decades of addressing the concept and context that encompasses environmental accounting, thus requiring rigorous and continuous monitoring of its scientific evidence. The aim of the manuscript was to analyze the global scientific production related to environmental accounting in order to assess the context and behavior of its contributions, thus enabling the planning and execution of future research. A literature search was conducted using the Web of Science database. A total of 299 published documents were identified, as well as the publication modality, the most productive countries, the scientific journals, the most productive institutions, and citation and impact indicators. Australia was found to occupy the first place with 50 published papers. In turn, Victoria University Wellington was identified as the institution with the highest number of publications. The total number of citations of all publications was 11,411. It can be concluded that there is an exponential growth of scientific production, being the last decade the one with the highest production, highlighting countries such as Australia, the United States and England, where publications had a relatively high impact as they are housed in quartile journals (Q1 and Q2) of the Scimago Journal Rank.
References
Asiaei, K., Bontis, N., Alizadeh, R., & Yaghoubi, M. (2022). Green intellectual capital and environmental management accounting: Natural resource orchestration in favor of environmental performance. Business strategy and the environment, 31(1), 76–93. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2875
Bebbington, J., & Unerman, J. (2018). Achieving the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals: An enabling role for accounting research. Accounting auditing & accountability journal, 31(1), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-05-2017-2929
Bernal Montero, M. L., & Santos Betancur, E. (2019). Una mirada a la contabilidad ambiental. Postulados y retos. Contaduría Universidad de Antioquia, 73, 199–209. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rc.n73a08
Boyd, J., & Banzhaf, S. (2007). What are ecosystem services? The need for standardized environmental accounting units. Ecological economics, 63(2–3), 616–626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.01.002
Brundtland, H. (1987). Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. Naciones Unidas.
Castro Alfaro, A. (2020). La contabilidad ambiental y su productividad científica a través de la bibliometría. Face: revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales, 20(1), 5–20. https://doi.org/10.24054/01204211.v1.n1.2020.4009
Cho, C. H., & Patten, D. M. (2007). The role of environmental disclosures as tools of legitimacy: A research note. Accounting organizations and society, 32(7–8), 639–647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2006.09.009
de Villiers, C., & van Staden, C. J. (2006). Can less environmental disclosure have a legitimising effect? Evidence from Africa. Accounting organizations and society, 31(8), 763–781. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2006.03.001
Gray, R. (2010). Is accounting for sustainability actually accounting for sustainability ... and how would we know? An exploration of narratives of organisations and the planet. Accounting organizations and society, 35(1), 47–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2009.04.006
Kolk, A., & Perego, P. (2010). Determinants of the Adoption of Sustainability Assurance Statements: An International Investigation. Business strategy and the environment, 19(3), 182–198. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.643
Laufer, W. S. (2003). Social accountability and corporate greenwashing. Journal of business ethics, 43(3), 253–261. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022962719299
Monteiro, A. P., Pereira, C., & Barbosa, F. M. (2021). Environmental disclosure on mandatory and voluntary reporting of Portuguese listed firms: the role of environmental certification, lucratively and corporate governance. Meditari accountancy research. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-09-2020-1001
Muller, N. Z., Mendelsohn, R., & Nordhaus, W. (2011). Environmental Accounting for Pollution in the United States Economy. American Economic Review, 101(5), 1649–1675. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.101.5.1649
Munoz Prieto, M., & Enciso Yzaguirre, V. (2021). Environmental accounting as a tool for incorporating environmental sustainability in Social Economy companies. Ciriec-espana revista de economia publica social y cooperativa, 103, 249–277. https://doi.org/10.7203/CIRIEC-E.103.17838
Nguyen, T. D. (2021). Factors Affecting Environmental Accounting Practices: A Case Study of Food and Beverage Enterprises in Vietnam. Journal of asian finance economics and business, 8(9), 211–217. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2021.vol8.no9.0211
Quiñonez, E. S., Balladares, K. A., & Estrada, F. M. (2016). Reflexion Contabilidad Ambiental. Revista Publicando, 3(7), 156–166. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=5833482
Schaltegger, S., Gibassier, D., & Zvezdov, D. (2013). Is environmental management accounting a discipline? A bibliometric literature review. Meditari Accountancy Research, 21(1), 4–31. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-12-2012-0039
Tukker, A., de Koning, A., Wood, R., Hawkins, T., Lutter, S., Acosta, J., Rueda Cantuche, J. M., Bouwmeester, M., Oosterhaven, J., Drosdowski, T., & Kuenen, J. (2013). EXIOPOL–development and illustrative analyses of a detailed global mr ee sut/iot. Economic systems research, 25(1, SI), 50–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/09535314.2012.761952
van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
Wibbeke, L. M., & Lachmann, M. (2020). Psychology in management accounting and control research: an overview of the recent literature. En Journal of Management Control (Vol. 31, Número 3). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00187-020-00302-3
Wiedmann, T. (2009). A review of recent multi-region input-output models used for consumption-based emission and resource accounting. Ecological economics, 69(2), 211–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.08.026
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.