Civil project management and process improvement: the case of the Tulcán Drinking Water Company
PDF (Español (España))
EPUB (Español (España))

Keywords

Project management; potable water; operational efficiency; monitoring; user satisfaction.

How to Cite

Flores Yandún, V. H., Cordero Guzmán, D. M., & Ortega Castro, J. C. (2026). Civil project management and process improvement: the case of the Tulcán Drinking Water Company. Religación, 11(49), e2601615. https://doi.org/10.46652/rgn.v11i49.1615

Abstract

The Tulcán Municipal Public Water and Sewerage Company (Epmapa-T) faces challenges in the execution of civil projects due to operational inefficiency, missed schedules, and low user satisfaction. A critical problem was detected in the pre-contract phase, which takes 3 to 4 months (38.8% of perceptions) due to fragmented interventions in different areas. This research aimed to analyze the influence of management factors on process improvement. A mixed methodology (descriptive-correlational) and a non-experimental case study were used, surveying 47 strategically selected collaborators and users. The statistical results (Multiple Regression) showed that Lack of Communication and Inefficiency in Document Management are the variables that causally explain the negative impact of delays (p<0.05). More than 73% perceive that schedules are met only occasionally or rarely. Furthermore, Emergency Response Time was found to be the most significant predictor of user satisfaction (p<0.01). The conclusion is that the solution requires the implementation of integrated management models to address fragmentation and prioritize investment in emergency response capacity to ensure the social return of projects.

https://doi.org/10.46652/rgn.v11i49.1615
PDF (Español (España))
EPUB (Español (España))

References

Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo. (2022). Digitalizar los servicios públicos: Oportunidades para América Latina y el Caribe.

Esri. (2024). Gestión, sostenibilidad, equidad y resiliencia de las infraestructuras. https://www.esri.com/es-es/industries/infrastructure-management

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2014). Multivariate data analysis. Pearson Education.

Hernández-Sampieri, R., Fernández-Collado, C., & Baptista-Lucio, M. del P. (2018). Metodología de la investigación: Las rutas cuantitativa, cualitativa y mixta. McGraw-Hill Interamericana.

Lloret-Segura, S., Ferreres-Traver, A., Hernández-Baeza, A., & Tomás-Marco, I. (2014). El análisis factorial exploratorio de los ítems: una guía práctica, revisada y actualizada. Anales de Psicología, 30(3), 1151-1169. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.30.3.199941

M., N. P., Viñan Carrera, J. A., Dillon, J. F., Ricaurte Coto, B. A., & Arias Salazar, D. P. (2024). Mejora continua en empresas de agua potable a través del modelado de procesos: Caso de estudio EP-EMAPAR. Revista Científica Multidisciplinar G-nerando, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.60100/rcmg.v5i2.355

Piña Ararat, M. A., & Bazurto Roldán, J. A. (2022). Modelo de madurez aplicado al contexto organizacional de la gestión de proyectos para la Alcaldía de Chinacota-Colombia. Project Design and Management, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.35992/pdm.4vi2.991

Project Management Institute. (2022). Pulse of the profession 2023: Power skills, redefining project success.

República del Ecuador, Asamblea Nacional. (2008, 4 de agosto). Ley Orgánica del Sistema Nacional de Contratación Pública (LOSNCP), Registro Oficial Suplemento 588.

Rivera Ynoñán, J. L., Villegas Alvarez, A. M., Farfán Martínez, J. M., & Ruiz Villavicencio, G. E. (2026). Ejecución de obras públicas en América Latina: Revisión sistemática sobre los desafíos para la gestión pública. Revista InveCom, 6(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15549569

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.